fkhr19, 06 May 2014need snapdragon 600/800?? then get the m7 or m8 this is not a flagship phone..M8 is not compact and mediocre camera which I use for business purposes,I rather pick S5 than M8. M7 don't microSD slot and also poor camera with purple tint.
Vino31, 06 May 2014Snapdragon 400 is the deal breaker.need snapdragon 600/800?? then get the m7 or m8
this is not a flagship phone..
Bokedla, 05 May 2014finaly,a 13 mpix snapper...Ultra pixels camera is better. NOT all are mpx.
anonymous, 05 May 2014Now that it has a 13 mp camera the price will be 699 DOllars without contract The regular 13mpx cam is cheaper than ultrapixel tech camera. Check it.
Looks like a Moto G upgrade
3G -> 4G
no microSD -> up to 64GB microSD
8GB internal memory -> 16GB
Wifi b/g/n -> a/b/g/n/ac (dual band)
Quad core 1.2Ghz -> 1.4 Ghz
5MP/1.3MP camera -> 13MP/5MP camera
720p video -> 1080p video
mono speaker -> stereo
Just wondering how much more expensive Mini 2 over Moto G.
devjyoti mishra, 05 May 2014it is preety good but what will be its price Now that it has a 13 mp camera the price will be 699 DOllars without contract
MMK, 05 May 2014HTC's is still a fresh and very beautiful design Samsung's is already dated, boring and che... moreYou say all that , but yet htc sales is no where close to Samsung cheap boring design
rajesh810222, 05 May 2014shame on htc....same design. ...why peoples only blame samsung.HTC's is still a fresh and very beautiful design
Samsung's is already dated, boring and cheap design
no one is going to blame HTC here!
why not a 1.6ghz quad-core s. 400 and 1.5gb of ram?? i mean it's by no means slow but there's no future-proofing. other than that seems very interesting. hope it's initially priced below 400 euro.
shame on htc....same design. ...why peoples only blame samsung.