Rajinders, 22 Feb 2016I agree with you Optics is Important than MegapixelsYou are forgetting the main thing the 'image sensor' all these things optics,sensor and image processing are the only things that matter in image quality.
LG G5 NOT RADIO....! very poor and high cost $$$ I wait Sony Z6!
A perfect Display size .It would have been a lot better if LG could insert a Battery of 3000 mah capacity. With slightly smaller screen and introduction of Qualcomm 820 this phone would have been the Perfect choice . Till the opinions of other users after it is released, would like to continue with old horse LG G3 but battery capacity remains at the back of mind.
G5 has FM Radio and Quick Remote (which means it has infrared). I saw it on youtube (Android authority LG G5 UX Feature Focus).
GSMA, please update your specs page.
for those who complaining about battery just would mention,
smaller screen + new chipset what is promise much better energy efficiency
"Qualcomm's claim on SD820's power efficiency as saying that it will double your device's battery life"
Sure not doubled the battery life but you will not notice that 200mAh smaller than predecessors.
Lg do you really mean it to introduce as flagship phone
Magic box battery stand
DealBreaker, 22 Feb 2016suure!...goodluck keeping it in your pocket!..G5+LG CAM Plus module.I dont like many gadget...i like all is to one...and the design of lg g5 is ugly...its better lg g4.
You will notice the dust hide inside the battery slot, just wait the time to accumulate.
Dont complain much,. Sony's Xperia X Perfomance has 2700mAh battery and its non removable,. LG got a 2800mAh and an add-on tht clocks 4000mAh,. Dowp stuff here guys,.
G User, 22 Feb 2016How about LG cam plus. 2800+1200=4000MAH. Yeah that's true keep dreaming.suure!...goodluck keeping it in your pocket!..G5+LG CAM Plus module.
The only drawback of this device is the battery. 2800mAH is not enough for a high end device . Sorry ,LG :(
AnonD-475625, 22 Feb 2016Nope....camera resolution as the g4....im expecting 20 megapixel as the gsm arena specificatio... moreSince when is the number of megapixels the most telling factor for judging camera quality? Postprocessing algorithms and optics are where it's at. Just look at the Xperia lineup. So many megapixels... but regarding all those high numbers, their real-world performance tends to be somewhat underwhelming due to the software corner-cutting.
this phone is perfect the only problems i have with it are mostly subjective like the screen size i have a note 3 and i dont enjoy these huge screens 5 to 5.1 for me. secondly the absence of an amoled screen i mean we all know lcd is a deadman walking nothing beats a full hd movie on an amoled screen the contrast and punchy colours make you feel like you are in the movie. thirdly i wish they just want with one uniform colour and not two different colours for the back and front. thirdly the absence of a fingerprint sensor the convinience of it brings is really something important for a flagship.
i congratulate lg on the modular concept although i had make the camera module with a xenon flash with the controls and an extra mic for better sound recording. the speaker module is the best of the bunch. the design is nice and innovative 7/10 for me. and in general i had give it 7.5/10 but due to my very subjective needs i had still go with the s7 but this is pretty perfect.
It's nice that LG are trying to innovate and to some extent succeeding with that, but my decision has been made yesterday. As much as i love LG (being a previous owner of LG G2 and now LG G4) my next phone will definitely be the S7 Edge.
LG has messed up on 2 crucial basic points: it's an ugly design - it looks cheap; almost as cheap as an iphone or those plastic $50 Android phones. And 2. The 2800mAh battery is not enough. It might be better optimized but i am willing to bet the S7 Edge will have 40-50% more on the endurance rating...
Sorry LG, you handed me to Samsung...