Hi, anyone happen to know if the USB cable provided might be able to use as USB charger as well?
I like a simple phone like this. But its too expensive! It doesn't has speaker phone & can't expand memory! Y ?????????? I was dissappointed to hear the price :(
well i had the kg800 it was driving me nuts@#$. I use my phone alot and the touchpad really sucked. so i sold it after one month use for 100 less, then i got the kg810 its better but i am having problems i cant use the call waiting. when i am on the phone and get another call the shuts off and reboots i did not know playing phone tag was so much fun!! the vendor of this phone told me, i need to not over charge my battery, so i got a new battery and followed the charging instruction to the tee. well!! problem still exist..love the phone hate the problem! does anyone else have this problem? please let me know if you do? reply is welcome.. thanks for reading.
wow. NO memory card slot, NO speakerphone, 1.3mp camera? weak EDGE? extremely horrible battery life? tri-band? what a pathetic effort on LG's behalf at mimicking RAZR.
for the same price you can now get the motorola KRZR K1. 2mp camera, microSD slot, excellent speakerphone, class 12 EDGE, quadband world roaming and a battery with 6 hours talk time (tested myself).
nice to see moto for once topping the koreans instead of the other way around. : )
damn, i really want to get this phone, just like i did with the chocolate. the features are somewhat dissapointing though, my old phone has a 1.3mp camera (SE S700i), and seeing as the 3mp sets are coming on to the market now, do I really want to have the same camera again? Im on the fence with this phone, SonyEricsson and Samsung offer similar phones to the "chocolate" style phones, with higher specs and lower prices...though the design on the LG phones keeps me from coming back...
this phone sucks!!!!!!i put my simcard in and NOTHING!!!!!WERE IS THE NETWORK?? no settings?? helllllooo??i got it free anyways new in the box so guess what lg fans i smashed it with a hammer and was a blast to see it shatter and all the insides to pieces!!! my moto razr was better anyways!!
Does this phone have a built-in hands free speaker? Should I go for this or SE Z710?
just got this phone on an upgrade, its awesome, really beautiful, and I would honestly recommend it to anyone looking for the pinaccle in styling and features.
less features then my old SE K700i ... and crapper battery life then my even older Nokia 3310... looks like a winner we have on our hands here.. late 2006 !!
LG should maybe stick to making appliances... or fire some of those female desingers ?
how can any one listen to the radio when this phone isnt an a speaker phone wow! wat a great accomplisment by Lg..
Features may not satisfy those gadget lovers, but i think these days cellphones should be evaluated on how unique and stylish they are-since most of the phones pretty much have similar functions...
Cameras.. 1.3 or 2... i don't think it really matters cuz everyone has digital cameras nowadays, it's not like anyone's going to take a picture of Grand Canyon with his cellphone...
810 looks great~ easy to use,
last but not least amazingly stylish...
i guess this was made after the slider chocolate so i dont know why no memery card slot or even a speaker phone,the camera stays at 1.3mp where as lg do 2 mp camera phones this could of been a great improvement on the chocolate but it isnt.
How about the sound or speaker quality of this phone? It is a stereo one??
It's OK, but the battery life is always the problem for LG. Please LG release 1000 mAh battery for this beautiful device.
IMHO, it is a very stylish phone. However, like the KG800, thats all there is to it. I think that around this time, if a cellphone were to only have a 1.3MP camera then it should at least support video conferencing. Too bad though, if LG had released both the KG800 and KG810 at the time 1.3MP was as good as a cellphone's camera gets, then I'd actually acknowledge them as very good phones. For a cellphone of these specs to be released at this day of time it is very sub-standard.