It's not an autofocus' camera. It's a fixed focus. Looks http://www.ubergizmo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/optimus-l3-2.jpg
i dont understand you gays...you bay a phone and after you discover the camera, screen etc is ruubish...way you dont taste it before you bay it??? you want compare with nokia or sony ericsson but you still bay LG or Samsung?? WTF
The camera is not as bad as the review tells.. much much better then galexy y and pop. superb bettery and looks. i love this device in just 7500 rs.
worst. screen. ever.
low quality screen, and too low resolution. everything looks pale and edgy.
Better buy old Samsung Nexus S or Samsung Galaxy S their price is near but they are way powerfull...
Great looking phone, big screen for price range, battery life is amazing wish though the bezel at the bottom was smaller.
i live this phone........... bellow price............ advance option............
i think it looks excellent and comes at a good price, but 240x320 pixels is what you find in a 2.2 inch screen not a 3.2.
In this range ...very nice phone ..
Better than samsung galaxy y..
1gb storage...1500mah bettary....
If u want starting level android go for this...don't buy
SAMSUNG GALAXY Y..Y DOUS..GO FOR LG..
240 x 320 on 3.2"?! That is absolutely ridiculous! Not to mention a 800 MHz (singel-core) processor!
My 2 year old X10 mini has 240 x 320, on 2.55"! And with its 600 MHz processor it's starting to be annoyingly slow (with a fast custum rom). Why would you make a phone with 800 MHz? This phone should be discontinued about a year ago...
galaxy y is much better with 7.2 mbps speed and this one is 3.2 mbps only.......again lacks somethng..........is lg studying the markets and market needs ???????????????
Price is 150 euro = $200. Too bad for 320x240 resolution and 384ram