Look so good, I think it has enough spec. for entry smartphone users... not too big, not too expensive probably.
really nice phone guys
if u want to buy a low cost android phones then go for it
n guys please dont comment if u dont have the rigth knowledge
Anonymous, 22 Jan 2011Optimus One is better than this. One is already slow enough, one cant imagine how slow this will be.how do you know it'll be slower than Optimus One?
Optimus One is better than this. One is already slow enough, one cant imagine how slow this will be.
No one interested for this under power phone. which'll cost same but deliver less and no flash on browser.
again lack of video call camera....when given all then why not this ??????????? still dont have a complete phone in mid sagement............
its same as optimus one..
bt it vl b on gingerbread..
gsmarena needs to update n wat about the processor??????
lg seems clever as galaxy n xperia series..
rather providing update on the current fone (p500) they r providing new devices wid latest os..
good job lg..!!
same as wat xperia x10 mini pro2 n galaxy ace r doing..
dont xpect any updates for these companies.. :)
God, I hope the specs are grossly inaccurate, otherwise I suppose LG is planning to ship all the units to the museum of technology history.
it could have been much of a looker (and smaller) if they just removed the ugly call buttons.
But if this phone is lesser than $200 then it will probably a hit.
When will they learn to put in a flash and a secondary cam in their phone.
another no front camera. cant use for fring or any apps for videocalls?
If those specs are correct, the phone should have been called the "Optimus Meh"