Very realistic specifications but the video on main camera could be 1080 and not 720. For the rest everything looks prima because this is what most people need.
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2016the processer is too weak!! be honest I admit that a Snapdragon 410 would have been a more desirable choice, but Windows 10 Mobile is still efficient enough that the Snapdragon 212 will offer smooth performance. This is, by no means, a gamer's phone, but it will run decently.
Well guys do you think will it support USB OTG. If it supports usb otg then i am going for it going to replace my lumia 630 then
Tagarela, 17 Feb 2016Ohh....if you have never notice that, the Windows phone OS isn´t like an android that ne... moreWell i saw many times windows in phone. At first glance it looks good but when u have the phone and use it a lot you will realize android is more comfortable.
Or maybe for me. But many users will think same.
Blunder, 17 Feb 2016You do know that specs do not determine the performance of a OS that much right ? Why do you e... moreBut as far as i know Microsoft and their overpriced phones are this wont cost 140 Quids. Maybe in Bitcoins. Which is anyway superexpensive like everyting from apple.
Aadrian, 18 Feb 2016Btekt already published a review of the Lumia 650 on YouTube. The phone really looks good. Only good feature whit this model....
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2016you compare THIS with Iphone hahaha, Iphone/apple always and ALWAYS more stable than windows.... morehow much is your salary?me i can buy 10 iphones in one day just for my private work but still buying lumia devices is make me happy. have you tried using lumia 1020?the monster of all monster of camera capture?
M.Aria, 17 Feb 2016and lumia 650 ?About 203Â€, same price as Lumia 830.
Lumia 650 plus point
OLED Display (297 ppi)
16 GB Internal Storage
8 MP Rear and 5 MP Wide Angle Selfi Camera
1.3 GHz Snapdragon 212 processor
Dual front microphone
Front facing hands free speaker
Two dedicated active noise cancellation microphone.
Video recording limited to 720 p in both camera. But capable to play 1080 *1920 Full HD video.
Support 4 G
Blunder, 17 Feb 2016You do know that specs do not determine the performance of a OS that much right ? Why do you e... moreyou compare THIS with Iphone
hahaha, Iphone/apple always and ALWAYS more stable than windows.
iphone only have high end model and use best SoC (on GPU and Single Performance) while THIS use cheapest shiit available. I guess Microsoft will use potato as SoC on next budget phone
Aadrian, 18 Feb 2016Btekt already published a review of the Lumia 650 on YouTube. The phone really looks good. Lumia 650 looks very beautiful.but it battery should be MAH 3000 and Ram should be 2 GB and its price should be 23000 and front cam 5 Megapixel with Flash light and none heat problem.thn i suggests For Lumia 65o.other wise Lumia not Better.
Bcz samsung provide all that thing in Galaxy j5 2015 and 2016 and Galaxy j 7.
Microsoft i will be very thankfull to u if u fix my problem about Lumia 650.
Btekt already published a review of the Lumia 650 on YouTube. The phone really looks good.
STYLO, 16 Feb 2016Here in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Lumia 640 LTE cost about 110-120Â€and lumia 650 ?
I would also like to point out that you people are all being ridiculous. The Snapdragon 212 is a solid processor that can easily run Windows 10 Mobile and is actually a very similar performer to the Snapdragon 400. The GPU is slightly worse, but the CPU is actually better. So get over yourself. 1 GB of RAM is plenty for Windows 10 Mobile, and with that you're also getting a solid camera set up, a beautiful and well-built design, a great AMOLED screen with Glance Screen support, and a generous amount of internal storage for the price (plus microSD card support). There's not a whole lot of phones that can offer such a well rounded package from a major corporation at this quality. The only negative thing I can really say about this phone (the only major negative thing at least) is the relatively small battery.
This seems to be an impressive overall package at a good starting price. It looks great and I'm pleased it has a front facing speaker. However, I'm disappointed that the bezels are larger than on my Lumia 830. I was hoping (with not much faith that my hoping would come to fruition) that Microsoft would make the Lumia 650 at least a bit more narrow than the Lumia 830, if not shorter. At least it's thinner and lighter, and it's a nice looking phone. It just annoys me (mildly) that the top bezel is so much larger than the bottom bezel. Surely it didn't need to be that large. And I would've liked Qi wireless charging but I'm thinking that's too much to ask for in a $200 phone. The only things that are truly disappointing are the small battery and the processor. I would've preferred at least 2,300 mAh and a Snapdragon 410. I might have to pick it up at some point if I'm feeling it, if only to play around with.