Motorola Edge - user opinions and reviews

• Anonymous
• I8E
• 26 May 2020

Do not buy this phone I bought my first one on the day it was released within hours I knew there were problems. More than 10. I got a replacement on Thursday and this one has issues although only two so far. Both of them the battery would only last 6 hours although I'm a heavy user my two-and-a-half-year-old Motorola Z-Force 2 phone to this day lasted longer. The screen bleeds is the issue along with battery life with both phones there's also a tissue when tapping on icons that you have to hit them sometimes three and four times to get the app to open up while watching YouTube the volume will suddenly shoot to Max without even touching it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Rory
• LBi
• 24 May 2020

I would buy this phone if the screen was flat...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 2Au
• 21 May 2020

Anonymous, 18 May 2020why 2.0, Type-C ? all other phone use 3.1 Type-C What is the difference?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Ali
• j}m
• 20 May 2020

what's the release date in US ?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• mJs
• 19 May 2020

yet another "upper midrange" device with 6,7" screen...wtf is wrong with manufacturers.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• B{9
• 19 May 2020

Scott, 18 May 2020If you aren't going to use a sim card, buy a Motorola phone! No signal is guaranteed at som... moreI've never had any issue like this with Motorola phones

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• kch
• 18 May 2020

why 2.0, Type-C ? all other phone use 3.1 Type-C

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Scott
• Tqh
• 18 May 2020

If you aren't going to use a sim card, buy a Motorola phone!

No signal is guaranteed at some point

I believe that they do it to force their customers to upgrade their phones

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• PE3
• 18 May 2020

Please make this available in Singapore :) Miss Motorola's presence here.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• SI
• gJw
• 17 May 2020

Nice phone but for middlerange phone should be more chip. Around 450

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• User
• X$P
• 16 May 2020

Has motorola resolved the heating issue in handsets ?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• vishal
• U{@
• 16 May 2020

No 120 Hz no feature pubg

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• p37
• 14 May 2020

The real contender here is the Oneplus 8.

I like both. I´d go for the cheaper one and better batery life

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 3xa
• 13 May 2020

Julian M, 13 May 2020That's one huge display, but the resolution is low. The price is high, too high for something ... moreIt's a 5G 7xx chip, and Qualcomm makes them pay a bunch for the chip and the 5G, it also has a large battery and 90hz refresh rate, and they need to make a profit

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Julian M
• MwP
• 13 May 2020

That's one huge display, but the resolution is low. The price is high, too high for something that is specced like a midrange product (look at that CPU) : between $400 and $500 would have been a little more realistic than $600.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Alex
• ptP
• 12 May 2020

It has FM Radio or not?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 3J7
• 07 May 2020

Sir_Irwin, 07 May 2020Motorola is missing the compass again?!?! What do producers think?!This seems pretty good, here do you think they're messing up?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Sir_Irwin
• 803
• 07 May 2020

Motorola is missing the compass again?!?! What do producers think?!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 8pu
• 05 May 2020

Compared to Galaxy A71 for example, this is much worth for money as in specs overall.

Nokia 8.3 5G (when available), might be more worth as it's Android One phone, if you are really disappointed in Xiaomi latests stuff.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 8pu
• 05 May 2020

Pedro, 23 Apr 2020¿Plastic back? ¿¡Really!?Galaxy A71 frame is even plastic :)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report