papichulo, 17 May 2016Shitty processor TBH. Qualcomm 650 processor would've been great. Atleast it has 2 fast A72 co... moreI agree. And those bezels are just awful. Best to skip this iteration. Lenovo is really changing Motorola for the worst.
shitty specs .....no adreno 5xx series which makes it more shitty....no water proof...cheap design
Is it waterproof? No where the certification of the phone moto G4 is mentioned??
There is no WiFi AC!?
Are you serious?
I would consider this phone if there is actually a 4gb Ram version!😎
Its 16MP has 1.3µm pixels.
The others phone with 16MP has only 1.12 µm pixel size.
Anonymous, 17 May 2016Only fault ugly home button it would be better for a rectangular one Ther are software keys that is just the fingerprint scanner no home key
Shitty processor TBH. Qualcomm 650 processor would've been great. Atleast it has 2 fast A72 cores which handles most tasks better than slower A53 cores.
Fail update IMO.
Only fault ugly home button it would be better for a rectangular one
there is no 64 gb, 4 gb ram version, only 16 gb, 2 gb ram for g4, and 16 gb, 2 gb ram or 32 gb, 3 gb ram for g4 plus
What a shit and ugly update to the 3rd gen moto G,
that UGLY SQUARE home button gave me cancer. Were the designers sleeping or what?
5.5" screen is not acceptable for all. The 5" moto G4 doesnt have a fingerprint sensor.
None of them is water proof. What kind of shit improvement is this? Lenovo just ruined Motorola.
moto g4 plus 2gb and 16gig variant in india costs- 13499
and moto g4 plus 3gb and 32gig variant costs- 14499.
AnonD-537767, 16 May 2016awsm spec.. g4 , g4 plus but wts d expect price?Moto G4 (plus)
16GB + 2GB RAM - 13499
32GB + 3GB RAM - 14999
I just finished watching the Moto event. The G4 is not very exiting. Only some performance increase with SD 617. Camera may be the same.
On the other hand G4 Plus has a great camera & FP scanner. But still SD 617.
The G4 Plus would have been a straight up destroyer if they put SD 650/652 in them priced around 13000 with all other features & specs intact.