Snapdragon 660 should be used instead of 630 and with amoled display and atleast 3500 mah battery, these specs suit 400$ device. Plus always on display and bezelless display or 18:9 ratio would make this phone a best selling of moto brand
Moto x first gen was the best in my opinion. The bezel the size and the amount of sensor they cramp into moto x 1st was amazing plus the screen size just hit the sweet spot 4.7 inch was just perfect.
I like x4 design so much, but will it selling in Asia, only Europe and USA version available now.
Moto X4 Plus version should have at least, a 5.5" display, A SD660, dedicated slots, and i think I'm sold.
Wasn't the Moto X4 supposed to sport the SD660? SD 630 would be so mid tier
Since my Moto G5+ was just $200 and I'm hearing $480 for the X4 way to much. Would only go about $350.
Overpriced phone. Without sn 660 and s amoled display i think lenevo phone is more better like as k8 plus or note with stock android dolby atoms or p2. unbeleavable price range
Paul, 05 Sep 2017Among the phones you listed, one is a one and a half year old flagship phone, the others are p... moreBloated software is taste isuee. You can't measure this. Everyone is used or have preference for different loaders. OP services are terrbile, thats true. But P9 in my country atm is around 330 euro, s7 is 430 euro. Huawei p9 has 3 years warranty, and after year and a half no big problems reported. Don't believe moto camera would come even close to s7 or huawei. CPU of s7 and p9 is more powerful and can handle a lot more bloatware and still be faster than X4. Moto phone is great, i wanted to have it ,but for around 300 euro. For 400 is a no go for me.
I can t remember mid range smartphone to cost as much as last year high-profile device and to be succesful.
This is the output and fate of Ex legendary Motorola after acquired by Lenovo !
Anonymous, 04 Sep 2017The problem its not if someone can afford it or not. We compare this phone to phones with sim... moreAmong the phones you listed, one is a one and a half year old flagship phone, the others are phones with dodgy manufacturers that will provide limited user service (OP), or manufacturers with not the best track record for updates (Huawei). The latter also suffer from having a bloated OS.
These are things you cannot overlook when buying a phone.
I just picked up a new Moto G5 Plus and now this X4 is coming out. I can still return G5+ for full refund but not sure this X4 is worth the cost (about double the G5+).
X4 has better
10% better CPU +1Gig ROM
I'm not into photos so much better camera not a big deal for me.
Looks like from Moto official site X4 doesn't have the FM radio the G5+ does.
I dont take only bevause of 68 % screen to bidy ratio. Motorola once famous in smallest bazzels is now making largest bazzel phones. I m a moto lover. But after moto x pure no minimum bazle phone. This is last hope. Now i think its time to leave moto. Sadly.
It seems to have 4/64 memory at least on Europe.
From Motorola Italiy:
64GB con supporto per scheda microSD (fino a 2 TB)Â‡
So it's single speaker,with no OIS or regular led notifications ... still prefer a S7, come on lenovo give me something i can work with here.
Paul, 03 Sep 2017A lot is being made of CPUs these days, and how many midrangers aren't equipped with top of th... moreThe problem its not if someone can afford it or not. We compare this phone to phones with similar prices. For the same price you can get better phones from bigger brands with better specs. Lets check p9, s7, honor 9, OP. In what aspect moto x4 is better (except ip protection and probably fast charging).. ? Maybe processor, camera, warranty duration, body ratio or what ?
For mid range phone specs are perferct, but price of mid range phone should be lower than last year top smartphones.