paralepiped, 29 Jul 2015Impressive screen-to-body ration and ridiculous thickness, 11 mm is a 2009's standard. Further... moreThe 11.1mm thickness is at the thickest part of the device - the back is curved.
I would suggest Not to buy Moto phones, as their display screen cost more than 70% of the phone price!!
i bought Moto X2 and I regret big time as its display screen is somwhere around $200 which is almost 80% of phones price.
Impressive screen-to-body ration and ridiculous thickness, 11 mm is a 2009's standard. Furthermore, the 5.7" display is too big for the regular user. I suggest that Moto X Style won't have market success, unfortunately.
math.addict, 29 Jul 20153000 mAh ? Tech guys: are you sure this will last? Why not X Play's 3600 mAh ?America doesn't get the play version
5.7 inch screen! too big screen size for a phone moto! So next gen would be 6.7 inch?!!
Where is finger print sensor... there is some rumors it have finger print sensor...any update
math.addict, 29 Jul 20153000 mAh ? Tech guys: are you sure this will last? Why not X Play's 3600 mAh ?Turbo charger.
demongokul, 28 Jul 2015Doesn't have OIS or Laser Autofocus.is it supposed to??
The specs of the phone are good for top tier category. Motorola apparently tried to fix the issues from last generations Moto X which are battery life and camera. Basically this phone is a more refreshed version of the Nexus 6 with the Moto X extra features. However, this phone is massive, Motorola basically have low/economic class phone (Moto E), medium class (Moto G) and a Phablet (Moto X), sadly no phone fits in the high class category unless you consider the previous generation Moto X.
Anonymous, 28 Jul 2015Weak device, no high end only mid range class. Not worth 400 bucks, may be 300, against S5+ w... moreHaha S5 is aweful. Home screen lag, shoddy and cheap construction, Touchwiz bloat, other Samsung bloatware. Expensive for what it is. $400 for an unlocked "pure" phone is great.
It's one of the best phone at this cost. But no one is thinking about SAR value. What's it SAR value. It would be better if screen size is more.
Anonymous, 28 Jul 2015Weak device, no high end only mid range class. Not worth 400 bucks, may be 300, against S5+ w... morePls name me one phone that is in that price range and that offers all these specs.