It's good. It doesn't have Wi-Fi, so what?
I don't need it. I'm just looking for an eye-catching smartphone with rich multimedia, and is there a better one than a Razr-like shaped smartphone powered by Windows Mobile 5.0?
according to this review, it does have Wi-Fi, but even if it doesnt, cant you buy a mini-SD card that has wifi or 802.11?? does anyone know?
seems some people dont know a good thing when it hits them in the face i am a treo650 owner has no wi-fi either and the touch screen i have disable wake up people motorola is going to rule
"Hey... news flash for all the complainers...
Blackberreis DO NOT have WiFi either." Actually, there is a blackberry with Wifi. Its the BlackBerry 7270. Its available only through Blackberry and even sports voip capabilities. It is however only available through Blackberry direct.
ppl need to get the features up higher cell phones are out of date get the tecnology up
I think motorola is jooking when they said phone with this kind of spec still under testing, still coming soon, 65k screen? others rushing out 16m,1.3m camera?polyphonic ringtones? got people still use polyphonic as their ring tones?
But I do agree, it got the look.
Oh ya, for people asking for touch screen?U all must kidding asking touch screen on a already small screen.
True the atom have touchscreen, 265k screen, bult in wifi, 2mp camera, flash, what is motorola thinking. This phone is king if released 6 motnhs ago. Kinda too late, now there is even no edge??? 65 k screen, 1.3 mgp camera and no touch screen. Motorola better change some specs or they will lose a large number of potetntial customer
By far, my personal opinion, if Moto not launch this product asap, their market will steal by xda atom, as O2 will launch atom on December, me also maybe will buy atom if have to wait this moto for another six month (even I am fanatic fans of Moto).
Fucntion wise i guess N61 beats this beauty but design wise i prefer this by far!! N91 also do not have camera and i hope the Qs camera will be good unlike all other motorola 1.3 megapixel crap.
how great is this phone compared to the Nokia E61? I'm having a tough time deciding which one, although I am a fan of Motorola.
It has bluetooth.
it just doesnt have wifi.
Would wish the wireless apps can store stuff to the card. ie vindigo, avantgo and email. cause the stock memory is pretty low.
The Motorola Q is most likely a replacement for people that screwed over by the defective MPx220. Since it uses the same MiniSD slot(instead of TransFlash, like most of Motorola's newest offerings) and has a lot of similarities with the MPx220 as well. I was one of those poor suckers who bought a MPx220, so I know all about their faulty P2K ports(quite possible the worst thing Motorola ever designed). I'm just glad that the Q doesn't use that worthless port.
Motorola listens to the customers but care about the providers: no WIFI - so you have to buy more airtime, no 3G so you surf the NET slow (even more time), and of course they get in bed with MS - the biggest ... I censor myself.
Do we really expect any MS product not to have bugs?
Q is a Sony Style product: nice but no substance.
Hey... news flash for all the complainers...
Blackberreis DO NOT have WiFi either.
Cell coverage whiel slower, is better because it is more available than WiFi anyway. If it only had WiFi and no cell data, you sh*t more bricks as well. Just get over it. This phone will ROCKR U.
damn i was expecting this phone to have wifi, but they dont have it in this model instead of V910.. a real turn off man..