- 6.5" TFT Touchscreen 65k colour 640x480 pixel
- Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional
- Intel XScale PXA270 624MHz CPU
- 128MB RAM, 256MB ROM
- QWERTY Keyboard
- SiRF Star III GPS Receiver
need touch screen lke iphone...! this technology is too old,, motorola plz inovate something new....!
what a pity smartphone... no 3G, not class 32 GPRS, and small display.
My speculation is, again Moto is focusing on 2 of its major markets' customers: USA and mainland China...both of which don't have the WCDMA 3G network being used everywhere else, hence lack of 3G isn't a big problem, as I know the 2G variant of Q9...the Q8, actually sells quite well in PRC.
I'm a Moto fan who is using both Q9h & A1600 (plus many more Moto phones), so the specs on Q11 doesn't attract me either.
Actually I plan to use my Q9 (which I bought in Jan) for 2+ years, just like my good old V3X, still works perfectly.
True! I was contemplating on whether to get Nokia E71 or Motorola Q11. Looks like this phone beats out Nokia e71 real good, in terms of OS! LOL
but, judging by the physical features, Nokia E71 has the sleekest built.
i wonder why Nokia prefers Symbian OSes compared to Windows Mobile.
oh, sorry. ultimate smartphone was an irony. but... still many folks like that stupid obsolete smartphone.
could you, americans, make sth more hi-tech and modern? is really an iPhone best you can do?
PEOPLE! are you BLIND?
look at the mamory. 64 MB RAM, 128 MB Flash. wtf?
look at the screen size, so small so pathetic
no fm radio in addition, as usual, as ever.
compare it with REAL best WM phones
HTC Diamond Pro
HTC Touch HD
see the difference? or still f... blind, motorola fanboys?
Dont compare Symbian with Windows mobile man.
Nokia Symbian s60 can totally multi tasking aany application since 5 years ago. window mobile stil not up to standard. and window mobile is the most unfriendly user interface. even Symbian UIQ develop by Sony is better but anyway UIQ now belongs to NOKIA. they buying every shares of symbian.
no matter what cpu they use, Window mobile will always lag for sure. e71 having 369mhz already lag free. so i dont see any needs of increasing the cpu speed for higher power consumion.
wanna compare it with E71? great! what if i told you that Q11 will cost less than 300 dollars and E71 costs 500? 200 dollars ONLY for symbian (Q11 runs winmo that has a greater diversity of business applications) and 3G? no, thanks.
Wow... this is the ultimate smartphone!! Look at all the specs!!!...is what I would say if it were 2006... lol!!
After using my moto q9h for three months, I got tired of it due to the lack of wifi. Now, the moto Q11 lacks 3g. Motorola should really gear up!!
Anonymous, 09 Oct 2008Real best Windows mobile 6 phone dont compare this with Nokia E71 Q11 Have 2 Processors and ... moresimply dont waste the time bcs you dont know the features of nokia e71 other wise you are a worker for moto
daniel, 09 Oct 2008So funny to hear people compare this to an E71, just remember an E71 is does not use push emai... moreYou can use Seven applicaions for getting push email, it is very easy to install and it works better than BlackBerry, I´ve compared the service online
moto q11 is an ok windows mobile phone with wifi and all....but E71 and a very good phone i mean....is NOKIA so...i would pick the E71 any day in front of the Q11 because thr E71 has everything to do business and have fun on the multimedia side
sopo, 09 Oct 2008Bluetooth v2.1 ??? this is the new version or what? is faster then 2.0 ???Looks like better encryption and less power consumption.