yeah, same as in indonesia here. most people are nokia minded. whatever nokia made the phone, it will be a best seller. eventhough the products is sucks. given a name nokia E90. at the first launching, the price was about $ US 1700. but people already sacrifice their self to queueing to buy this phone. can you imagine that? with $1700 you can buy much thing...
also nokia 6300 and n76. nokia 6300 have sucks battery life and n76 somehow looks like a razr copycat with a very brick and cheap design and material. and it become a best seller in their class? OMG...with a less money, you can get more,
great for nokia to do that ( i give my two thumbs up), but poor for indonesian people being fooled by nokia...
This design is VERY good. I can't believe its score is only 6.9
I mean, compared to the N76, this is a quality design.
Moto is supposed to annouce better camera phones by the year end. Recently they got a tie-up with Kodak for that. Right now they lack that expertise in my opinion.
And the person below Graeme...yeh somehow Nokia managed to create that impression, that phone means nokia and its gotta be good.
Right now I'm in India and whenever I use my samsung slider..there will be some dumb to ask me which nokia model that is..so you can imagine how things are here.
I'm going to ignore the looks. Motorolla hit a winning design with the Razr and it's served them well, and has been pointed out it's not like any of the other manufacturers are known for doing amazing things when it comes to appearances (Samsung silver sliders, Nokia candy bars, Sony Ericsson stupid joysticks). It's not a straight forward RAZR repeat anyway.
On the other hand, the specs aren't that impressive. To me it appears like Motorolla are lagging behind. Some people are putting 5MP cameras into their phones but Motorolla still lounge around with 2MP. Apart from that it all seems so standard. Where's the innovation? Where's the crazy, cool features that will make the rest of the industry think? I'm getting bored of handsets with 2MP cameras, bluetooth and expandable memory... that's what they all seem to have!
ok you bellow, the why nokia phone who have similiar design like razr (n76) have a good rate. even the body is from cheap plastic
im not a motorola or nokia or se fans. but i think there something wrong here. for who have a good eye, i think this phone deserve a better rate than much phone from other manufacture.
but clearly most of people here give a rate from who is the manufacturer. and clearly most people here are nokia minded..whatever nokia phone is always have a good rate...whatever other manufacturer phone always have a rate lower than nokia, eventhough it looks better.
but if you give a rate looking for the phone, not the manufacturer, it will be different.
No wonder why Motorola do Not expect to be profitable from Mobile device business this year.
Too afraid to try out a new design. How long one can ride on one success!!
Good features. But I would love to see them in a different design.
You rate it low cos ya'll are just mad jealous it's a Motorola and not a toyphone like SE, Samsung, Nokia and the lot...
When i look at SE's i get double vision and go totally beserk... is it a k601, k610, k510, k501, k300, w800, w900, w900i... i just give up...REALLY!!!.. THEN U MOVE ON TO nOKIA... IS IT A 3310, 3301, 5510, 6110,, 1110, AND BLAH BLAH BLAH... GOSH U BORING Nokia and SE users baffle me. Now u got the N80, N95, N75, N75ME, N70, N81, opooooh mannnn... i mean talk about being non creative with a plan to confuse buyers.
Razr on the other hand...simply the razr...when u look at it u know it's of the razr lineage.. no messing about.
Cheers Moto... u rule big time.
to answer your questin oyte, the reason why we rate this phone so low is because it looks just like the one we all bought nearly 4 years ago . you think your honda from years past looks just as cool now as it did back when it was new . i didn't think so
wow, another razr . by the time you know it , even people in the middle of the amazonian rainforest will have one . and they can't even get reception . these things are everywhere . why does this world need anymore variations of it . i say move on to another design . can you imagine if by 7 years from now this thing is still here . thats like me using a startack now but just a bit more advanced . unbelieveable
i dont know why do you rate it so low and the phone is so upgrated and its simply great
good RAZR phone , but have to upgrade call records (incoming, outgoing, recieving) " 10 " to further more like ROKR " 20 " or KRZR-" 40 "
this time, I'm waiting for the O2 Cocoon. It is reach in feature, although not so good in the design.
maybe your really right, but my turn offs about this phone is that It doesn't have a flash, that's the number one for the second how will u used it in video telephony?
yes they all look the same but if you dont have one then you'll never really appreciate it.
why the hell is everyone bashing motorola's?
you say motorola makes the same looking phones every time?! all hail nokia? well, let me open up your eyelids and go click on the nokia listing. if you can't tell me that there are more near-identical phones by motorola than there is nokia, then seriously, you have issues.