this phone has the same failure as the Sharp GX-32.
The bluetooth is only available for bluetooth handsfree. You wouldn't be able to use it for picture,or files transfer at all!! so it's no difference than NOT having bluetooth!!!!
I really do love the size of the screen and it's japanese phone!! it's a "japanese drama phone" but still..very disappointed..
and on huge reason the m900 cam is better is because its not lousy CMOS like this is..... thats why even tho this is a true 2mp a ccd interpolated 2mp will be better resoulution!
and so it doesn't seem one sided for the m900 this is a photo i took and NOT EDITED much sharper.....
this si a photo from the nec n840 in nice bright sunshine on a beatiful day to bad the phot isnt nice.... M900 is so much better then this and its a 1.3 interpolated cam thats kinda sad
it will cost about 800 canadian dollars, after i converted it from china. just to let you guys know its an awesome fone, but its much too expensive
This is will be one of THE BEST phones out in the market. It was announced Nov. 11 that it would be out but now it's Jan. and still no sign of it...
NEC takes good pictures but so does M900.....I own M900 and has tried out NEC too. Picture quality is not really bout pixel counts but technology as well......even though m900 has a 1.3 MP camera which can produce pictures of 2MP quality, the quality is stunning and my friends agreee too. It's up to personal preference
tryin to make my mind up whether to buy n840 or m900, read all ur guys comment and phone reviews on both phones.its all for and against...favourin m900 for its camera effects still wondering whether n840 takes better fotos cos both phone features are similar.someone who seen pictures who has phone give me some feedback....and is nec840 max meeory only up to 256? plz reply asap..i need decide next two days
The NEC will be probably cost more money than the Mitsu, so the phones apply to different users and i don't think they can be compared.
thats true it does not have bluetooth but to me that does not matter cuz i dont use it.
i belive that the m900 is not made to compete with this phone, it may not be a true 2mp but it is a 2 mp camera mp3 two color screens mp3 player and java apps, seems pretty much the same so i wouls say they can compete......
the opinions of the NEC picture quality will always be personal, some think it's better than the m900 some think it isn't.
But the point here is that the N840 is not made to compete withe the m900, but with the Sharp TM200. If you look at the features and the design of the Sharp and the NEC you will see why.
i also never seem to find any M900 user/defender that even dares to open their mouthes about the bluetooth difference?!?
both the nec n840 & the mitsubishi m900 are available in my country & i have tried both. the n840 is a real 2 megapixel & the m900 is not. the camera & picture quality of the nec is definately better.
one major problem with nec hand phone is the standby time........always too short!
well you can compare the nec and m900 photo and there is a huge diff m900 is crisp and clear and nec is detailed but blurry and pixely.....
nec makes there owns screens plus samsung screens were good but latley they have sucked i was looking at d500 and it looks like shit compared to m900.
the NEC n840 is better than the M900 because it has Bluetooth, a true 2 megapixel camera and probably a better screen (rumor has it that Samsung makes the screens for NEC)
also i think that the N840 is made to be compared with the Sharp TM200, and not the lower-class Mitsubishi M900...
my only worry is the lowlight performance on N840
M900 is famous for lowlight performance (that's one of the only benefits of super-honeycomb CCD sensors to me really)
and the mp3 ringtones support is still not 100% sure yet. i see half the reviews claiming AAC and not mp3, then the other half claiming full mp3 unlimited support. i dunno what to believe.
i've read all previews online already zol sina pconline etech it168 ringhk everything
The links you posted are not working.
You do not have permission to get the requested URL from this server."
But anyway, I'm not going to argue anymore on this. I know that you got the M900, and would defend it no matter what.
Just wanted the others who are wondering to get a M900 or a N840 to be have more options, as I definitely think the N840 takes much better pictures. To me, even the N830 takes much better pictures than M900. That's my personal opinion. Punctum.
i wouyld like you to take those photo i posted and circle the "edgy- jaggy" parts it looks pretty smooth to me.... and crisp
1. So you do own a M900. So much for unbiased opinions...
2. I never said that the screen on N840 is any better than M900. But since you mention it, I think the quality of the screens should be pretty similar. Both have same resolution, colordepth and about the same size.
2. They are not releasing "a crappy prototype", since the phone is not out on sales yet. The review which you referred to was definitely using a prototype. I have seen reviews in January which used different menus.
3. I never said that the N840's menus are better than M900. They might very well be crappylooking even in the finalized version. I just wanted to say that the menus on M900 are not brilliant looking either. (100X better my ass)
4. So the picture I was referring to wasn't looking sharp enough to you? That's fine... the others can take a look and decide for themselves. I have seen many pictures taken with the M900. If sharp for you means over-jaggy edges and full of noise, fine. I think the pictures from N840 looks much more natural... but that's me.
If you are so happy with your M900, fine...
The others might want to take a look at the N840 before getting the M900. That's just my UNBIASED opinion.
also about the ugly m900 menu well i will let people choose wich look better....
i personaly think that the n840 res or menu style comapers at all with the m900... so much clearer and better menu display