thgun2, 04 Nov 2014A budget handset, not a smart move for Microsoft's first branded mobile. Enough said.maybe microsoft wants to start it from entry-level and step-by-step to flagship??
And there it goes, all feeling of kvality and durability. I did not think the name change would bother me, but it does. Nokia was not just a brand, it was a kvality stamp. I already look at this as a porley built breakable microsoft thing. I hate Steven Elop for ruining Nokia phones.
Nokia or Microsoft but I'm addicted to WP....It was a sick Platform once upon a time but for me now its better than iOS and Android
Galaxy S3, Note 2, Lumia 630, Lumia 920, Huawei Honor 3C, iPhone 5s, iPhone 4 user
Don't expect lower price from microsoft. Even lumia 630costs 8000rs
Just don't understand, MS has Xbox, Office, Surface, Band. So what's wrong with Nokia..? I smell something fishy... Wait until Nov 17..?
well I prefer nokia brand anyhow, but still going to use windows for phone because simply I got ill feel already for android and iOS, more than Microsoft.
Its good if it is having configuration fighting enough to moto e and redmi...
Anonymous, 04 Nov 2014I bought Nokia because of Windows Phone OS. Nokia is crap without WP OS.Oh poor you lol. You bought Nokia because of windows. Microsoft was nothing without Nokia. If you did your history you'd see how windows mobile and their early handsets were a big failure. Rather like the Zune.
A budget handset, not a smart move for Microsoft's first branded mobile. Enough said.
windows phone has just 3% market share whereas android as 84% market share... first let microsoft to beat apple ios later u can talk about android.
specs looks complete enough. if got a good 5mp autofocus and a 1.3mp front selfieand also 1Gb ram. it's good to sell below USD200
I don't care! When's the next flagship coming? Should I buy 930 or wait? That's what I care about!