Display Mate crowns Galaxy Note 4 display Best of the Best Comments

• Jawad Younas
• KI39
• 19 Nov 2014

iphone is expensive due to his brand name .. they sell each product with over price .. they do not have some thing new this year .. just their software ios is different .. samsung did great job .. and Note 4 is beast of the smartphones ..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Chaostheory
• qbnu
• 19 Nov 2014

There's hardly any comparisons, why even post? The Z3 has an equal if not better screen than the 6+. Although some sites complain about colour accuracy, they fail to mention it's adjustable.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• kazoomya
• BqYD
• 19 Nov 2014

iFans be like "well it's amoled and it's oversaturated!"
NOPE. DisplayMate says so. The colors are more accurate than your typical IPS LCD. Sorry iFans. You couldn't brag iPhone 6 has the best display.

• Rating5 |
• Reply
• Report

• Rick
• 7LgP
• 19 Nov 2014

Here come the delusional people to try to counter argue and say that it's fake and false because of past experience with amoled. No its not over saturated, its the best display on the market, we don't care about your opinions and what you think is right when its not, just shut up and take the L and know that the note 4 has the best Display.

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• iCrap
• HktX
• 19 Nov 2014

iPhone just a overpriced with nothing new inside. Just a brand status and nothing more than that.

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• Sean Lumly
• sgp6
• 19 Nov 2014

And there you have it, folks. Despite only being around 4 years old, AMOLED mobile displays have surpassed LCD in nearly every way measurable.

AMOLED has proven to have better colour reproduction, better power characteristics (assuming average white level of ~50%), better contrast, larger potential color gamut (sRGB is very small and not representative of human vision), faster switching speeds, thinner screens (fewer layers), integrated touch-sensor, etc. And the price of production is falling -- it may soon be cheaper to produce compared to LCD as demand increases. It is clearly a better technology for mobile displays.


And since only the pixels that are lit need power, it should allow for always-on displays. For smartwatches, this is a no-brainer. It should be possible to have a smartwatch that actually displays the time without needing to be woken up. Ditto for smartphones.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Akira
• mAD8
• 19 Nov 2014

kiza, 19 Nov 2014some of products from this list are older than iP6. how can it be, if iP6 was the best last time?The iPhone was labeled to have the best LCD in a smartphone. So the answer is, those added to the test are either not smartphones and/or have something other than LCD technology (for example AMOLED), in this general (not just LCD or smarpthones) shootout.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• namealreadytaken
• vGMr
• 19 Nov 2014

Here comes the boom..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• kiza
• Mf5B
• 19 Nov 2014

some of products from this list are older than iP6. how can it be, if iP6 was the best last time?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• er.rohit
• 7j$T
• 19 Nov 2014

No one can reach samsung's technology.

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• deep sohi
• tUdx
• 19 Nov 2014

wah wah

• Rating3 |
• Reply
• Report