I could still find a new Nokia 3310 at a cheaper price than this phone.
I think it's decent price for rugged (IP67) phone. It will be good replacement for Samsung B2710 (Xcover 271).
Good I will buy it, if its not to much of a brick thickness wise
AnonD-374508, 13 Mar 2015Compare to previous xcover: + display size + battery - thicknessFor a toughphone, I'd want it to be as thick as possible.
nic, 13 Mar 2015good to go for nokia 515.Yes for rugged feature phones no one beats Nokia.
I wish if Nokia reenters this field it should produce phones like Nokia 1100. I miss my moon light and flash light Nokia 1100 alot. It's water proof too. :)
99 EUR?! Way to expensive! But, for $50 I'll buy one for my mum. She'll love such an oldtimer!
ithehappy, 13 Mar 2015Another day = Another Troll ROFLLOL, right. I always see this objective guy saying that word.
Compare to previous xcover:
+ display size
AnonD-354090, 13 Mar 2015Another day=another SamsungAnother day = Another Troll
Shamsung, 13 Mar 2015LOL...who will buy this foneI don't know, human beings? Do you know what those are?