well even if it will coast 550 euro it doesn t matter cause SE made phones for special people so you have to be special
Amigo, 07 Oct 2009Wou dude. Samsung sucks as a company? Have you ever had a Sony (TV, cd player, notebook, digit... morei don't think so , i work in a phonestore for more then 3 years now and the most cellphone's that are broken or made out off cheap plastique are samsung. Samsung L310 was a disaster. SE on the other hand are a more expensive but you get a better build quality with better materials. When you work with a se you feel that it's better made , it feels more expensive. But that's my upinion offcourse.
normally it will cost 499€ , we had a meeting with the ambassador off se for our bussiness and she said that the price would be as cheap as 499 €. I'm curious when it hit the shelves
No public relations from SE
No official announcement
No specs on SE websites
Just release the phone?
Has anyone found a review of the final version?
This seems like it was rushed to the market because of the Nokia N900 and HTC Touch HD II.
Amigo, 07 Oct 2009Wou dude. Samsung sucks as a company? Have you ever had a Sony (TV, cd player, notebook, digit... moreI have all Sony products at my home (Bravia, PS3, SE, Vaio) and I have never had a problem with them, they work great and Im so happy with them. when someone mentions Samsung, it reminds me on a cheap plastic which sells alot because its cheap but it sucks in performance.
P.S. Im from Europe too
Sony Ericsson's first flagship Symbian device will sell well but will have to build a very appealing and strong mid range io order to succeed over the medium term. It should abandon building low end plastic nonsense and concentrate on innovation which brought success to the company in the first place culminating in classics such as the K800i. Should SE lower the price of this device to the 350 Euro mark,it could become a best seller. High price prevented its predecessor, the C905i, from achieving this.
Amigo, 07 Oct 2009Wou dude. Samsung sucks as a company? Have you ever had a Sony (TV, cd player, notebook, digit... moredude samsung and sony are both great companies but there is no question that sony is wayyy better ask anyone in the world
it is expensive but always the best dont try to fool yourself
you get as much as you pay
No 3.5mm jack. Mistake. Period.
Anonymous, 07 Oct 2009who mentioned pictures ?! Samsung sucks as a company (thats much more than making phones)Wou dude. Samsung sucks as a company? Have you ever had a Sony (TV, cd player, notebook, digital camera, etc) The average lifetime of a sony is about half as long as the average lifetime of a Samsung. When the warranty expires you can throw it away. Sony is the only company from Japan that behaves like a typical American company. Looks good, but the quality is below all standards. You have obviously no clue how Samsung is working and how big the company is. LCD panels, 70% memory market share (90% in the phone business), phone cpus, even cars. If you want a Sony, get a Play Station, and that's it. Read about the Koreans, and get a real opinion. P.S. I'm from Europe.
[deleted post]nokia is not the creator, s60 was co-created with sony,nokia just holds majority of symbian shares most of the mobile companies have the shares
Taking into account that this phone uses TFT touchscreen instead of Capacitive, they are doomed to perdition. TFT touchscreen are most of the times irresponsive, and you need to press more than once to make them react. If you do not believe me, watch the movies on YouTube showing TFT phones.
Capacitive technology is superior in that it identifies the electrical charge of a human finger and the touch is light like a feather.
The other side of the TFT technology is that you end up with ugly scratches on the screen. In the Capacitive type, the screen is hard like a sapphire watch.
Am I right in this analysis?
Anonymous, 07 Oct 2009well if u compare innov8 to c905 ull find the samsung takes much better pcitures. i predict sa... moreHow can u say that the innov8 takes better pictures than the C905, The camera lenses that samsung use suck, the poor quality speakers suck, and the overall fell and quality of the phone its self suck. In conclusion samsung suck!!! SE is much better in every single way.
I agree, others cheapers phones have similar price. I´ll buy one when it´s available in Brazil
Anonymous, 07 Oct 2009well if u compare innov8 to c905 ull find the samsung takes much better pcitures. i predict sa... morewho mentioned pictures ?! Samsung sucks as a company (thats much more than making phones)
Mobilemaster, 07 Oct 2009You are RIGHT man, I told this many times, but some guys can't see the difference. This phone ... morebig deal if its the first smartphone to have 12mpx. pixon was the 1st to hv 12mpx and on a smartphone its the productivity, apps... that matter, not the camera. besides if ur gna buy a phone for its camera u wud probably compare both and not consider that satio is a smartphone as well.
Anonymous, 07 Oct 2009you know ... Samsung suckswell if u compare innov8 to c905 ull find the samsung takes much better pcitures. i predict samsung will make a better 12mpx phones but will lack something like wifi which wud be a deal breaker for a lot.
people wake up this is an awesome phone and it only costs 499 euro on amazon.de its totally worth it nokia sucks
satio 4 ever
Anonymous, 07 Oct 2009But Samsung W880 is not Smartphone. Satio is 1st Smartphone with 12.1MP Camera & use Symbian OS.You are RIGHT man, I told this many times, but some guys can't see the difference. This phone rocks! :)