Bane K., 25 Apr 2015Hahah its 75% more efficient becouse its 10 times slower then broadwellwell broadwell has true 14nm, arm's 14nm cpus are a play on words
"at the same performance, the Cortex-A72 will use 75% less power than an Inter Broadwell CPU. It is worth noting that Intelís chip is overall significantly more powerful."
Just dont understand - 'same performance = but Intel more powerful?
Interestingly, ARM claims that, at the same performance, the Cortex-A72 will use 75% less power than an Inter Broadwell CPU
LMAO. This is basically saying "A toyota corolla uses significantly less fuel at the same speed compared to an Mercedes S-class" I'm impressed ARM had the courage to make such an ignorant statement...
Anonymous, 25 Apr 2015No, Sansung is not ahaead of everything else. Keep dreaming lol 😁 Way further ahead than you think
Why would any of the custom core designers such as Qualcomm be able to design better cores than ARM? Patents? Well - time will tell.
this mean its better not buying any smartphone this year. current phone still work and smooth why bother upgrade. i'm prefer upgrade when, much longer battery, better performance, less time charging and better screen
sks, 25 Apr 2015Are you joking arm you can't even mess with intel Ha Ha Ha haaaa......Let the mongoose cores take on next intel mobile soc...
M.G, 25 Apr 2015another brainwashed fanboy who keeps commenting as anonymous Another trll projecting their problems.
Anonymous, 25 Apr 2015Why wait for this when Galaxy S6 already has a 14nm CPU? (Exynos 7420). Samsung is already... morethats very true, it will take a while till other orms catch up to samsungs galaxy s6 tech. but it was a given that thier tech will far ahead as they kead in R&D in the mobile industry. good luck to others closing the gap that sammy is opening.
What is with the Broadwell comparison?
Tablet CPU competition?
Broadwell is still too expensive just for use in tablets.
Anonymous, 25 Apr 2015Core-M is not at all powerful when compared in per W basis. Even in raw performance it will so... moreIntel had been monopolizing the CPU market since forever, not just 5 years ago. As for performance increase, if you think harder, you would understand that the CPU in PC is way faster than all other components. for example, the reason AMD could thrash Pentium D even at half the clock speed is the shift of memory controller On-die. then the SSD which speed up the overall system that the user can felt physically, rather than thru benchmark.
The fact is current Wintel CPU is still ahead of other system components that a 4 years old Sandybridge core i5 CPU could run any games and any application today, so why would intel spend billions in R&D to improve when they can alter the existing design and charge user premium? of course, the lack of competition doesn't help. you can blame intel dirty unfair business tactic but ultimately, is AMD couldn't deliver another Athlon 64.
The current smartphone market is like PC of last decade, everyone is chasing number but never realize if these number actually mean anything in real world. just look at the QHD on a tiny 5.2" display, not forgetting site like GSMA keep mentioning any phone without QHD res or lack of 4K video is a con. just how irrational these people and sites can get?
Anonymous, 25 Apr 2015Why wait for this when Galaxy S6 already has a 14nm CPU? (Exynos 7420).
Samsung is already... moreu should learn about soc and all the technical stuff first !
samsung uses ARM cores and 14nm is manufacturing process and that depends on the maunfacturer ! samsung has 14nm manufacturing facility . but that doesn't mean samsung won't use this ... this is an upagrde over the cortex a57 in the exynos 7420 ...
well i can't explain all things in here .. u first line learn such things !
Why wait for this when Galaxy S6 already has a 14nm CPU? (Exynos 7420).
Samsung is already years ahead everyone else.