Apple's $930 million court winnings from Samsung reduced Comments
- Anonymous
- kCQ
Anonymous, 19 May 2015I'm a huge Apple fan, but, Apple as it is today is what you can say are not Innovators. Now St... moreSteve Jobs wasn't an innovator.
He operated under a design first philosophy and emphasized designers over engineers in their products, but making something look pretty isn't really what I would consider being innovative.
- Anonymous
- 9LB
Anonymous, 19 May 2015Let's not get carried away now. Jobs and Apple might have made their products prettier to g... moreI'm a huge Apple fan, but, Apple as it is today is what you can say are not Innovators. Now Steve...the guy was just brilliant with all the products he made while at Apple. Nothing today could be as good as what Steve had made back in the day when he was around. If Steve was alive, Apple would be something different from what it is Today so you cannot say Steve was not an Innovator because that would just be plain ignorance within yourself against the guy.
- Anonymous
- kCQ
Anonymous, 19 May 2015You're the first person I have ever came across that has ever said anything like that about th... moreLet's not get carried away now.
Jobs and Apple might have made their products prettier to gain popularity, but I wouldn't say they are innovators.
- Anonymous
- 9LB
AnonD-276592, 19 May 2015Continuing Jobs' evilness even he's in hell.You're the first person I have ever came across that has ever said anything like that about the Late Great Steve. The guy's innovation was out of the world and you gotta give him his credit.
I wonder if you even know who Steve Jobs was??
- AnonD-276592
- vp1
Continuing Jobs' evilness even he's in hell.
- Anonymous
- kCQ
JD, 19 May 2015Dont be crazy child!It's not crazy.
This is basic law. It's not illegal to copy designs as long as reasonable consumers can differentiate who made which product.
Besides, if we're talking about the modern smartphone design, you might want to have a look at the Samsung F700.
- JD
- QJq
Anonymous, 19 May 2015According to the courts, "overall looks of the iPhone can't be protected." There ... moreDont be crazy child!
- Anonymous
- kCQ
According to the courts, "overall looks of the iPhone can't be protected."
There you have it. It's not illegal to copy designs so long as reasonable consumers can differentiate between competing products.
This amount will be reduced to $0 in further appeals, meaning Apple will lose every lawsuit with Samsung so far.
Applesexuals am cry. =)
- AnonD-89109
- ute
Apple: The MOTHER of copying.
- Anonymous
- IWQ
JD, 18 May 2015I think there is little or nothing that will stop Shamesung from blatantly copying others........ moreNot like Apple didn't copy anything.
- AnonD-364786
- XNa
Brad666, 18 May 2015what particular feature/looks did samsung copy to iphone?everything ..
S6 looks like , well like S5 and not like iPhone 6 .. :P
- Anonymous
- 0nq
Both companies spent something like 20 billion dollars on legal crap like this. Much better invested in R&D.
Apple trying to patent pinch to zoom is just laughable, good job Douglas Engelbart didn't patent the mouse.
Samsung though should do more of their own thing, even the s6 box is very apple like. Note I've owned Apple and now samsung s6
- Anonymous
- 4ST
Haha just read the lawsuit and cell phones involved with lawsuit!
- AnonD-1825
- p77
AnonD-1825, 18 May 2015The list is long http://samsungcopiesapple.tumblr.com this is great site to show it :DAnd add their latest tablet into list too, it's so obvios copy from iPad.
I saw it next to iPad in magazine and they are almost exact same looking, especially now when samsung went to that outdated 4:3 too ;)
- AnonD-1825
- p77
Brad666, 18 May 2015what particular feature/looks did samsung copy to iphone?The list is long http://samsungcopiesapple.tumblr.com this is great site to show it :D
- Brad666
- 2Au
what particular feature/looks did samsung copy to iphone?
- Akira
- mAD
Anonymous, 18 May 2015The EU and the US are 2 different places with different laws. It's just like in S. Korea wher... moreAnd they also feel that way because most of the patent disputes in this particular ruling are about design features part of Android itself, rather than what Samsung added to it.
Not even about how the devices look.
- Anonymous
- 5K}
Anonymous, 18 May 2015Samsung should NOT pay a dime, for this iB/S . It's SHAME for US that this case even exist. ... moreThe EU and the US are 2 different places with different laws. It's just like in S. Korea where not only is copying accepted, it is encouraged and is looked upon as a sign of respect and admiration. Companies want their products to be copied. In Samsung's eyes (and in their own court system), they did nothing wrong.
- JD
- QJq
I think there is little or nothing that will stop Shamesung from blatantly copying others...... Shame really......
- Cenas
- mVA
'Murica!
Our law is the truth!
Tip us
1.5m 109k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up