Royale and Elite. This phone will clearly have an added edge towards others.
Micromax is just traders.... China design houses hep them...then why do they boost by them self?
mohit, 19 Jun 2015range is high according to mobile specifications.....range between lie 10k to 15k that is not "high". Moto g costs higher and still packs only 1GB of RAM.
range is high according to mobile specifications.....range between lie 10k to 15k
rebelrawmess, 18 Jun 2015So finally micromax creates something original ? I lost faith and high hopes i had on micromax... moreNope.. They don't.. Check out Wiko Highway Pure.. Been out for sometime now.. Must be some Chinese OEM rebranding for everyone..
Anonymous, 19 Jun 2015Micromax become maker launch thinest phone in the world. it is reallt impresive with thin leve... moreIt is a rebranded phone.. No innovation by micromax.. Check Wiko Higway Pure..
Micromax become maker launch thinest phone in the world. it is reallt impresive with thin level. It's thinner more samsung and Apple. I hopr India meaker will inovatiion and develop more after have experience from other brand. I am beleive that one day recently, we can see mobile phone have thin level same paper and glass .... It is reallt impressive
I dont get a lot of the comments.
Making a phone thinner than the competition often comes at a price, and then I mean price, as in extra money you have to pay.
Sure, in some markets, you might be able to get better spec'ed phones than this for less. Two things to consider, how much did those phones cost when they arrived? And are they as slimmed as this one?
I'm not saying that people want this slim phones. Not even if they came with the highest end specs and had as good batterylife as the competition, and at no higher price.
This might be a badly developed product in the sense that money went in to making a phone very slim, when that is not what people are looking for. Perhaps they should have made a phone with the exact same specifications, but cut developing cost, and thus end price, by not slimming it down this much. Or perhaps they should have done a product with higher specifications, that is not as slimmed, and that would cost the same or be somewhat cheaper.
But that does not change the fact, that in this case, you have to add the slimming down process to the price of the phone. If it's a smart decision doesnt matter, it still costs money to slim devices down.
Anonymous, 18 Jun 2015Agree,its not comfortable to hold...will they still go further??As long as we have a bunch of pipe dreamers thinking that Moore's Law works in everyone's favor then yes. Eventually people will stop calling 10'' devices tablets, and claim they are useful as portable "media centers". We already got those with 4'' and 5'' handsets. I don't care how razor thin the phone is it just adds 200$ to the price tag. I remember when the race to making a better keyboard actually influenced stronger devices. HTC and Motorola used to make respectable powerhouses with physical keyboards instead of racing to the Razor-Thin bottom.
And then you have a gross percentage of GSM Commentators that want even thinner octo-core newspaper phones with fake gold accents and a fancy name. No wonder the market is saturated with redundant garbage.
Anonymous, 18 Jun 2015Agree,its not comfortable to hold...will they still go further??See, phone manufacturers nowadays have signal lamps instead of a brain :D Only thing that lights up the bulb: more thin, more megapixel, more breakable, more money
it is really thin no matter .but the desig is not the best around they didnt try bezeels like the ones on g2..those are perfect.