Anonymous, 19 Jul 201516:10is much better. 4:3 is uselesss for anything but reading. 16:10/16:9 is the perfect scree... moreReading on the web (or a book) is one of the primary uses for a tablet so yeah they are right to be after it. However 4:3 is useless for reading, 3:2 is closest to ideal it can fit an a4 paper with only cutting some of its left and right margins (which is great because the tablet's bezels play the role of the bezels too).
So yeah 4:3 is good for nothing, Samsung only uses it to copy Apple without thinking once that it is one of its primary downsides. Btw 3:2 is great for movie viewing -on landscape- too.
Apple is like this , they create some great things and some very bad, unfortunately both tend to stick, I would had much preferred if companies other than Apple had HCI departments which would choose the bad from the good Apple features instead of mindless copying...
What no 12K screen? What about a 300 core processor? I was expecting a subwoofer with 7.1 channel surround sound. Very disappointed.
It would've been markedly more palatable had Samsung bestowed this latest incarnation with non-superfluous features.
AnonD-78094, 19 Jul 2015downgrade on screen resolution, upgraded processor.. idk why they follow the iPaad trend of 4:... more16:10is much better. 4:3 is uselesss for anything but reading. 16:10/16:9 is the perfect screen ratio. I would've bought this device, bjt now I,won't because of this. Because I spend a lot of time watching movies/video, that's why I need a big highres Super AMOLED display. But with 4:3 screen ratio and lower res than last year, it's not worth it. I'll just buy last years device when it's cheaper cuz of this.
It'll be the old 32-bit Exynos 5433, what are you doing sammy? http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=sm-t810
downgrade on screen resolution, upgraded processor.. idk why they follow the iPaad trend of 4:3 resolution. 16:10 is good enough.
Meh. Why is this interesting? The screen on my 5.7" is better ppi than this. Why the mega bezels? Unnecessary and waste of screen real estate. New phones have 4 GB RAM, this only 3? Sub-optimal IMHO.
regs, 19 Jul 20154:3 is much better than 16:10, but 9,7'' is a bit big, while 8'' is too small. 8,9'' of Nexus ... moreI think that nexus 9 is on a smallish side of tablets. 12 inch is perfect for me.
Anonymous, 19 Jul 2015Looks good though I hate the new aspect ratio and they could have made it thicker and put in a... more4:3 is much better than 16:10, but 9,7'' is a bit big, while 8'' is too small. 8,9'' of Nexus 9 is ideal.
This tablet won't lack in speed with that Exynos 7, but I'm afraid the battery life won't be good :(