minus points:- (1) mobile's text input and editor is hazy.
(2) it have software problem. whenever i plug in my charger to charge batteries phone shuts off.
(3) camera quality isn't satisfying its like 1.3 mega pixel quality and there is no flash'
plus pints:- (1) internet speed is good.
(2) internal memory is good and it can runs most of all applications without problem.
I love the design of samsung :)
Please, do not copy from sony of htc!
samsung is launching good bar phone that they needed , than they can beat nokia
Update fw 4 your products,please..
Great service costumer,please..
Hear your fans,please..
Or I NEVER BUY your phone AGAIN :)
Seriusly, what's the difference between S5550 and G600, besides the 3G? Could't Samsung just add a 3G antenna to the G600 and remain its design? The G600 is by far more beautiful and qualitative phone, and i'm sorry that it is going out of production and being replaced with dull cheap-quality plastic phones like these ones. Such a shame!
Samsung has very lately introduced fine handsets.Shark1 and shark3 are inspiring.3.2mbps 3G support is attractive.
I think if i hav 2 buy a low entry phone id go with sony they look far better and offer mor,thanks 4 still tryin samsung.
Samsungs doing well lately but I'm not very pleased with the names they give to the phone even though the named it under Shark series having S5550, S5350, S3550 - seems confusing.. S,3,5 are being repeated again and again. They better name them like the other models they have like corby, omnia, star, jet etc. or at least something that can be easily remembered.
whats the point in these phones, they are just like so many other samsung phones. also i know they are meant to be cheap but im sure it wouldn't cost anything to put a bit of thought into the looks of it. they are so ugly. actually every samsung phone is ugly, with the grey buttons and dull designs. samsung should copy sony ericsson and htc in the designs.