lg user, 12 Oct 2015sd 800 better than this 620 processor.Not really. My phone runs SD 801 and my geekbench score was around 2900-3000. The SD 620 on the other hand scores 4100+. It has the new Cortex A72 cores, so it's almost as powerful as the SD 810.
they should enlarge this phone to 6" or 6.3" to replace Mega with better spec.
AnonD-431313, 10 Oct 2015How much? if its $500 or more NOPE!THAT IS TO OVERPRICED.But i think it is still a good mid ra... moreI have to agree with that. Samsung seem to not understand the price bracket for mid range device. It supposed to be around $300 only not over $500.
How much? if its $500 or more NOPE!THAT IS TO OVERPRICED.But i think it is still a good mid range phone but it is too overpriced with $500
hohoohoo... the benchmark result look good. but, the real daily usages will always lag. blame lagwiz for that.
This one could be good. Camera probably the same as in A8 or S5 Neo. Screen size on the limit, specs are good. Hopefuly not too thin and not too expensive.
5.5 inch for the win, -5 inch screen are for wimp. Those who like small screen doesn't deserve high spec phablet
Galaxy A9 will be Samsung thinnest smartphone, again. Always happened in the A series. The only metal and thinnest smartphone category.
Umbilical Noose, 09 Oct 2015Are you talking about same benchmark where single core test for S7 was lower than iPhone?Multicore is more important for android phones, and while the multi core was completely outmatched, it only has less than 10% more on the single core. But yes, that's the one.
AnonD-442781, 09 Oct 2015Benchmarks suggest the s7 will be a definite winner in terms of CPU, GPU might be crappy again... moreAre you talking about same benchmark where single core test for S7 was lower than iPhone?
I really wish Samsung does not screw this one like A-8, and price it appropriately. Can really be a good device with those specs. Also I wish they don't make it anymore thinner, in fact make it a little bit thicker to put a bigger battery than A-8.