Very bad battery life..
imposible to talk 13h ... or 30 like lenovo.
AnonD-442781, 18 Oct 2015I wouldn't buy a phone with anything lower than 70, 80+ preferred.I always do when the battery is removable (I simply pop a spare and have instant 100% battery).
Granted you have to carry a spare which is a non-issue because they're like 10 times less volumous when compared to ugly mobile chargers and they offer instant 100% (mobile chargers are dog slow, and require a wire).
AnonD-442781, 18 Oct 2015I wouldn't buy a phone with anything lower than 70, 80+ preferred.You know this is a test and not representative of actual battery life? Every test has flaws, just look at how many contradictive info there is in different reviews. Basing a phone purchase on its 'endurance rating' is silly unless the difference is really HUGE.
I wouldn't buy a phone with anything lower than 70, 80+ preferred.
Pretty bad score, guess the MX5 isn't for me.
All phones have had the same or worse battery life from last year. I dunno why anyone's surprised.
this thing has zero optimization
I own one and i say that these battery results are wrong,my phone lasts for 1 and a half day with Sot(screen on time) of 4 hours and 40 minutes and that is on medium use,on heavy use it reaches Sot of 6 hours and 30 minutes and lasts for full day,thats all
Where it at tho?
Disappointing to say the least.
maybe they should have stuck with exynos. mediatek's quite good price-performance wise,but they're crap in regards to efficiency.