AnonD-442781, 18 Oct 2015Most apps are multi threaded for android, and that is a fact.Prove it.
Ofcourse they gonna change cpu bcos A chips series NEVER belonged to (cr)apple company!
They had this chip from university in wisconsin
They both probably fell out with each other so this happened ..
Apple is one milky company which has architectures or ideas and all of these doesn't belong them !
What is their only is just fake design which confuses ppls(MOST) brain via eyes..
They used to have IBM chips in their desktop/laptop products but again they had to argue so they fell out with IBM in first place..
I really wonder when they start arguing with intel.. they will start using amd chips maybe in future :DDDD
the future is about compatibility of app stores
apple should allow iphone apps to work on windows phone, android
microsoft should allow windows apps to run on android and iphones
if an app is submitted via google then google will earn commission for hosting and serve ads via google
if an app is submitted via itunes then apple will earn commission for hosting and serve ads via their network
end users in windows, google or apple platform might be able to choose any play store to download their apps
wish that happens!
Anonymous, 18 Oct 2015It's too bad the next iOS update will make the 6s crawl worse than a 2010 Android phone. I ... moreI'm pretty sure it is just iOS9 being unoptimised, 9.1 will fix it, X.1 updates have fixed low performance before too.
Anonymous, 18 Oct 2015Samsung don't use a single snapdragon this year buddy. It all exynos line. You are living in a cave.Ignorance..
S6 and note 5 variants didnt use snapdragon but many other phones shipped has snapdragon
Utter nonsense, Apple CPU division has taken years to get upto where they are today, market leaders in mobile SOC performance and viability. Intel is total cr@p in SOC for any segment.
Apple is looking to replacing Intel in everything for the long run, they are just waiting for ARM server players to pick up speed before committing to high end ARM based computing for client laptops and desktops.
If they need Intel and Intel needs Apple it's okey. What Apple should think more is new battery tech. Maybe you tech writers want to praise CPUs but that have not been issue for years.
All phonemakers should unite their forces and make better batteries that really can last a week or two. For me is really hard to buy a phone nowdays. First issue is still price. Over 600 euros or 650 dollars is too much. Second is batterylife. 1-1,5 days is nothing.
Iphone A9 is so dumb they need Intel to put some intelligence in their devices.
Anonymous, 18 Oct 2015Samsung does not have a a9 chip . Only had it in their devices. Samsung uses the worthless lag... moreSamsung don't use a single snapdragon this year buddy. It all exynos line. You are living in a cave.
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2015The Samsung A9 is actually superior. Check Tom's hardware analysis. It's same speed as TSMC bu... moreSamsung does not have a a9 chip . Only had it in their devices. Samsung uses the worthless lagging snapdragons.
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2015A9 is overhyped and only wins in single core performance.
In dual / quad / octa performance, ... moreA9 only has 2 cores, but wins quad-hexa-octa core processors in graphics and many other benchmarks. It's like weighting 60kg in boxing, and beating down 90+.
Apple can any day add 2 more cores and wipe the floor with any other SoC. It's just that atm it doesn't need these extra two cores to be the best.
no matter what Intel, samsung, TSMC.... no matter what chips maker or which chip technology...... in next iDevices launch.... when Apple mentioned the chip is 10x faster, 5x better battery life, 15x GPU power.... everybody will be huha huha........ and it will be sold for millions..... even the tech is outdated.....
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2015i stil stick to huawei honor phone, its smooth n with reasonable priceyou rule man
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2015Wake up, it's 2015. Look at atom x7, intel's soc has the performance to match the high end ARM... moreAtom X7 a.k.a. z3735f+ ? My 2 year old phone has a better cpu. Also x7 is a tablet chip. Imagine how much worse a phone chip would be (early 2013 performance?).
Intels on mobiles are like AMDs on desktop: "next year it would be the best", except that "next year" never comes and instead the slide continues.
I doubt A10 would be x86, but if it is ... poor apple. It would be the first time that an older apple (a9) would be faster than the " new one " (a10).
If Intel could get more seriously into the mobile market it would definitely be a good thing. It would be nice to have more competition for the Qualcomm/Samsung duopoly.