Samsung Galaxy J3 launched with quad-core CPU, 720p screen Comments

• Mahi
• YQE
• 19 Jan 2016

who much time for release

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• DIGVIJAY SINH
• X}x
• 26 Dec 2015

when this phone is launch

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• suman
• vGL
• 24 Dec 2015

I want it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Nick Name
• Hkt
• 23 Dec 2015

when Samsung J3 will released

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Rahul Yadav
• 7w5
• 14 Dec 2015

I like samsung galaxy j3.When is it launched.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• rKJ
• 12 Dec 2015

Rahul Jha, 12 Dec 2015Hi, I'm from Bharat (India) I want to buy this mobile , so could you plz tell me when it's lau... moreHii guys J3 launch 25 dec in india market appoxmatly

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Shivam dwivedi
• Hkt
• 12 Dec 2015

When it will available in indian market ! I'm waiting

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Rahul Jha
• KAH
• 12 Dec 2015

Hi, I'm from Bharat (India) I want to buy this mobile , so could you plz tell me when it's launch in Indian market .

Regards
Rahul Jha

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• krish
• ter
• 23 Nov 2015

good phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• TRK
• 22 Nov 2015

It looks classy.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mOhD DaNiSh
• w43
• 22 Nov 2015

I don't want to buy this smartphone becausde i have already bought galaxy grand prime. This is too like to samsung j seriese

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• habib
• mT@
• 21 Nov 2015

samsung always come profit by mid range smartphone only ...but they don't care about mid range smartphone user .....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• LLL
• tDx
• 21 Nov 2015

Anonymous_amanoma, 21 Nov 2015Why would you compare Moto from this non-mid range phone? Moto is way beyond faster and high e... moreThat is exactly my point. The Moto G is better while being a budget phone (many reviewers praise it for that). This J3 must be significantly cheaper to compete, but how low can they go?
Time will tell.
I didn't claim to be a genius when I made that comparison. ;)

P.S J3's top bezel is slightly too much. Samsung could improve on that by doing away with the logo.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Sambo
• sX9
• 21 Nov 2015

4.5" screen would have made for a more comfortable 65mm width.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous_amanoma
• 9La
• 21 Nov 2015

LLL, 20 Nov 2015The 16GB/2GB Moto G is better. 13MP cam, front speaker, waterproofing, 16 GB, 2 GB RAM, and n... moreWhy would you compare Moto from this non-mid range phone? Moto is way beyond faster and high end than this device. Just look at the specs and try to compare it properly to other phones. The comparison is not that genius.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Sadegh
• B}3
• 20 Nov 2015

2 tone front color is nice . I like it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-131793
• Bqx
• 20 Nov 2015

gam33toronto, 20 Nov 2015iphone 6?Ativ S???

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• LLL
• tDD
• 20 Nov 2015

The 16GB/2GB Moto G is better.
13MP cam, front speaker, waterproofing, 16 GB, 2 GB RAM, and near stock Android.

This J3 must undercut the Moto G significantly to compete against it.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Shawon
• ubI
• 20 Nov 2015

Avi_love12, 20 Nov 2015Again The Touch button are Noy backlit... Samsung u shuld give these feature Must. if u progre... moreI also think so. Backlit is something that makes a difference but samsung is clearly neglecting it one after another release. May be it's time to triumph fall of a giant as before Nokia suffered

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Simon
• gDH
• 20 Nov 2015

The design is phenomenal. Especially the black and white front. That's the concept that should be explored by premium models, and it's the thing that makes the phone actually stand out significantly in a very awesome way.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report