Anonymous, 05 Dec 2015What he did is end a conversation that was going nowhere. They are the reason it was going nowhere. And no they didn't end it. The just made false claims and side tracks
Anonymous, 05 Dec 2015Yet you are still the one replying out ofcontextWhat he did is end a conversation that was going nowhere.
AnonD-362866, 04 Dec 2015You still cannot reply in context I see? Still can't accept the bottom line too ey? You might ... moreYet you are still the one replying out ofcontext
AnonD-442781, 04 Dec 2015Thankfully I haven't deluded myself into thinking Io work for Samsung so it doesn't bother me,... moreYou still cannot reply in context I see? Still can't accept the bottom line too ey? You might want to look up "delusional" in the dictionary. Annnnyways, have a great weekend bro ;)
AnonD-362866, 04 Dec 2015And this has how much relevance to what I said? Trying to forget the bottom line again? I know... moreThankfully I haven't deluded myself into thinking Io work for Samsung so it doesn't bother me, it should bother iPhone buyers who have to deal with cheaply made devices though ;-).
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015"Cheap Tech" performance beats the daylights out of your highest Android flagships.
What a ... moreLol cute attempt.
An app launcher on a strong soc has good scores.... Shocking
AnonD-442781, 04 Dec 2015Only delusional Apple fanboys think the iPhone uses LCD screens for any reason but cost,even A... moreAnd this has how much relevance to what I said? Trying to forget the bottom line again? I know you hate them ;) please try your utmost best to reply in context.
AnonD-362866, 04 Dec 2015Who cares? BOTTOM line is that Samsung will report even larger financial losses next year lmao... moreOnly delusional Apple fanboys think the iPhone uses LCD screens for any reason but cost,even Apple's chief designer said their screens are old compared to amoled. Oh wait...
AnonD-442781, 04 Dec 2015The only reliablein-deth test that was done was by tomshardware, who said that the Samsung chi... moreWho cares? BOTTOM line is that Samsung will report even larger financial losses next year lmao this is hilarious! Don't worry, at least we'll take your OLED screens and modify it to iPhone deserving quality in 2018 ;)
AnonD-196881, 04 Dec 2015TSMC chipset working better than Samsung in iphone 6s series and as we saw many days ago in gs... moreThe only reliablein-deth test that was done was by tomshardware, who said that the Samsung chip is 10% more efficient. Unless you provide a source from a place like anandtech or tomshardware, and have in-depth testing, as well as a good explanation why 16nm did better than 14nm, then just leave quietly.
lolliman, 02 Dec 2015good for you, now try again tomorrowfor sure I will but I posted here for some body like you to open their eyes and see the trust....
TSMC chipset working better than Samsung in iphone 6s series and as we saw many days ago in gsmarena reports.when news was released where were some of those don't accept that?ha?
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015"Cheap Tech" performance beats the daylights out of your highest Android flagships. What a ... more^This FTW
AnonD-442781, 03 Dec 2015Look, I already relied to you last time and quoted the conclusion that was also quoted here, t... moreIt looks like you too are ignorant and have never heard of the term "binning".
AnonD-111717, 03 Dec 2015here is one of them, also from GSMArena. http://www.gsmarena.com/iphone_6s_samsung_and_tsmc_a... moreThat simply means APPLES A9 design os not optimised for fabrication on a 14nm process so hance the questionable perfomance inconsistencies. Coz on thier own chips the fab shows efficiant behaviour. Cant wait to see how the mongoose from sammy behaives in day to day use and on video rendering jobs based on the speculation it should be able to cut my S4s render time in half.
AnonD-364786, 03 Dec 2015inferior to TSMC quality ;-) i am sure you are not living under the rocks Look, I already relied to you last time and quoted the conclusion that was also quoted here, that Samsung is more efficient than tsmc. But I understand you want to live in denial. Good luck!
AnonD-448062, 03 Dec 2015Please show me where the results are that you speak of.here is one of them, also from GSMArena.
http://www.gsmarena.com/iphone_6s_samsung_and_tsmc_a9_chips_yield_different_battery_life-news-14379.php
there are bunch of articles and user reports about these things.
14nm should not be the same as 16nm, it SHOULD be better, and in A9 case, it's worse.
Samsung refuse to give their latest tech for A10
That is why apple were forced to use TSMC.
SIMPLE AS THAT
Apple just use "word" for business trick
you know how BIG is that massive giant samsung
and how big baddass their R&D spending
they prepare for 11k screen tech
can you imagine that... yes 11K screen that is very crazy
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015Tomshardware said Samsung's 14nm is superior (Up to 10% more efficient than TSMC's version). ... moreDoes the term "binning" ring any bells for you?
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015Hey, tool, the point of saying "5-year-old" instead of the phone name was to emphasize how muc... moreOSX is laggy? El Capitan is completely smooth actually.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up