HSBC says TSMC will be Apple's exclusive manufacturer for A10 SoC Comments
- Anonymous
- 7Xt
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015iOS 10 will make the 6s lag, just like how iOS 8 and 9 makes my 5s and iPad 3 lag worse than m... moreI wish that you could have a real Apple product like the one that your talking about.. come on wake up... your dreaming buddy...
- AnonD-364786
- PB7
AnonD-442781, 02 Dec 2015We had this conversation last time, but after I provided a reliable source for you showing tha... morewhy don't you quote your posts ?
anyway i don't need to point out that your favourite JK Shin got booted out of mobile division bcoz of excellent performance of samsung mobile division :P
- AnonD-364786
- PB7
AnonD-442781, 02 Dec 2015We had this conversation last time, but after I provided a reliable source for you showing tha... moreinferior to TSMC quality ;-)
i am sure you are not living under the rocks
- AnonD-448062
- CD@
AnonD-111717, 03 Dec 2015you can see the A9 chip results. 16nm vs 14nm, and the 16nm is better, there is certainly som... morePlease show me where the results are that you speak of.
- AnonD-308243
- NmP
Good luck to apple on meeting supply demands and why compromise on samsungs supperior product for a supplier who will clearly strugle in shiping the required bulk. This could shrink the launch day availability in certain markets.
- Anonymous
- sHX
AnonD-111717, 03 Dec 2015you can see the A9 chip results.
16nm vs 14nm, and the 16nm is better, there is certainly som... moreTomshardware said Samsung's 14nm is superior (Up to 10% more efficient than TSMC's version).
It was never proven that TSMC's 16 nm was superior.
- AnonD-111717
- 61v
Ritzie, 03 Dec 2015On what basis?you can see the A9 chip results.
16nm vs 14nm, and the 16nm is better, there is certainly something wrong with Samsung's 14nm.
- Ritzie
- ib7
mir, 03 Dec 2015It's only logical for apple to go with the better chipset fabricator. TSMC are actually better... moreOn what basis?
- Anonymous
- sHX
mir, 03 Dec 2015It's only logical for apple to go with the better chipset fabricator. TSMC are actually better... moreThis is incorrect.
Apple is more concerned with price than quality, else they would be using Samsung's AMOLED.
Samsung's 14nm is superior to TSMC's 16nm no matter how much you want to believe otherwise.
- mir
- t7E
It's only logical for apple to go with the better chipset fabricator. TSMC are actually better than Samsung, so this is the result.
- Anonymous
- sHX
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015And you can't even remember those "Android phones" models or names which are supposed to be "f... moreHey, tool, the point of saying "5-year-old" instead of the phone name was to emphasize how much Apple sucks at doing hard things like engineering and programming. Most people wouldn't know how old the Motorola Droid X is. Saying 5-year-old makes it more impactful about how much Apple fails at making quality products.
Their maps software is a disaster. Their OSX is a laggy POS compared to Windows. All of their components, save for the CPU, is designed by other companies. Apple is only good at making pretty rectangles - That's all they're good for.
- Anonymous
- uJx
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015iOS 10 will make the 6s lag, just like how iOS 8 and 9 makes my 5s and iPad 3 lag worse than m... moreAnd you can't even remember those "Android phones" models or names which are supposed to be "faster and better" right?
Irony.
- Anonymous
- sHX
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015"Cheap Tech" performance beats the daylights out of your highest Android flagships. What a ... moreiOS 10 will make the 6s lag, just like how iOS 8 and 9 makes my 5s and iPad 3 lag worse than my 5-year-old Android phones.
- Anonymous
- uJx
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015Samsung's 14nm is superior to TSMC's 16 nm. Tomshardware proved it.
Foxconn is only an asse... more"Cheap Tech" performance beats the daylights out of your highest Android flagships.
What a shame :)
- Anonymous
- sHX
AnonD-196881, 02 Dec 2015it's related to iphones 6 series benchmark tests.when the TSMC 16nm was better and more power ... moreSamsung's 14nm is superior to TSMC's 16 nm. Tomshardware proved it.
Foxconn is only an assembler.
The others are just repackagers.
Samsung's parts are very high-end and expensive, which is why Apple doesn't want to use their AMOLED panels. Apple wants cheap tech.
- AnonD-292154
- mXx
Anonymous, 03 Dec 2015Ohh sorry my mistake, Didn't realise "capacity" to supply parts was more important than qua... more It looks like they want to go with TSMC next year .
- Anonymous
- TSB
AnonD-364786, 02 Dec 2015Capacity !!!
TSMC proved where they are standing when comes to qualify !Ohh sorry my mistake,
Didn't realise "capacity" to supply parts was more important than quality.
- AnonD-442781
- JiP
AnonD-364786, 02 Dec 2015samsung usually loses its edge when comes to quality !!!We had this conversation last time, but after I provided a reliable source for you showing that Samsung done it better you strangely stopped replying. Guess this time will be the same~ ;-)
- AnonD-442781
- JiP
AnonD-196881, 02 Dec 2015it's related to iphones 6 series benchmark tests.when the TSMC 16nm was better and more power ... moreThe only proper, reliable test, was done by Tomshardware, who showed that the Samsung chip was more efficient. Apple doesnt like Samsung but because no one could compete they used them anyway, now they finally found a substandard substitute and are happy to take it.
- AnonD-364786
- XNa
Anonymous, 02 Dec 2015So your precious apple are more than happy to use sub standard parts (according to you) and s... moreCapacity !!!
TSMC proved where they are standing when comes to qualify !
Tip us
1.5m 109k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up