Deep space bar, 19 May 2010your too funny 1.3ghz means the OS is too heavy and needs more power just to run
Which is sad... morePlease open your eyes and see how SLOW symbian is:
Deep space bar, 19 May 2010your too funny 1.3ghz means the OS is too heavy and needs more power just to run Which is sad... morelol. symbian is the most sluggy and slow os eveeeer. browsing on it is the worst ever experience. scrolling is only at 15FPS!!! Like wtf??? Symbian is the shttiest os anyone has ever used. when you open a menu sometimes it takes seconds. for gods sake. get a life.
Anonymous, 19 May 2010Symbian is cool, if youre an uninteresting dweeb with no charisma, like Dweeb Spack Ball.lol
iphone, 19 May 2010symbian is worse os ever.. only lamers use it ;) iphone with 400mhz is faster darn htc with 1.... moreyour too funny 1.3ghz means the OS is too heavy and needs more power just to run
Which is sad
400mhz+means that if better hardware is added it will be 4 times faster then an OS that needs to run on 1.3ghz
If symbian runs fine on 400mhz and 128mb ram as a minimum
Take a look at android
500mhz+ and 512mb ram since it's too heavy as an OS
You wouldn't notice a speed or performance increase
But you would with symbian since
The requirement is smaller
If you guyx don't understand then something is wrong with your
tugcrew, 19 May 2010symbian is cool, it all depends on what you expect from a phone.Symbian is cool, if youre an uninteresting dweeb with no charisma, like Dweeb Spack Ball.
Symbian sux and maemo is a FAIL. And when 'meego' comes it will be too late. Lol.
Deep space bar, 18 May 2010Symbian still can do more then the others Who cares if it doesn't look all nice and flashy if... moresymbian is worse os ever.. only lamers use it ;) iphone with 400mhz is faster darn htc with 1.3ghz ps
I wish companies would focus more on making new and improved batteries instead of making phone with better hardware that drains the battery faster and faster
Anonymous, 18 May 2010Symbian sux! If you say otherwise, you live in the 90's...Too bad symbian s60 didn't come out till 2003 lol
Anonymous, 18 May 2010Soooo true... Symbian and Windows Mobile should die! (well, they are dying...lol)Damn you must be an idiot there is only few problems with the symbian os which nokia promised to fix them, by the time the nokia n8 is released we'll be able to judge the direction of symbian in the touch screen market and up to now it looks promising. There is nothing wrong with the symbian non touch ui,it is smooth,fast and does all the work greatly fast, nokia is still leading in the market share by selling simple devices running the non touch symbian (s60 3rd edition ). On the other hand the windows mobile has taken a very huge step in developing their touch screen ui it really looks promising and with the specific requirements that microsoft has set to the manufactures we'll be able to see devices with really great specs and impressive overall performance.
I don't know what is worse... windows mobile or symbian. they are both terrible!
remember when steve ballmer laughed when the iphone was presented? now who's laughing? stupid windows mobile was the most unreliable smartphone OS ever!
and symbian? that shit is so old that I am impressed how nokia still tries to push it on us. It was bad 10 years ago and it is bad now! it was so bad when it was presented that Sony Ericsson had to create a custom UI to cover that mess... just made it worse actually!
DIE windows mobile! DIE symbian!
Soooo true... Symbian and Windows Mobile should die! (well, they are dying...lol)