The At&T bound Galaxy S looks akin to a droid, a blackberry storm and the recent Acer Liquid, so in that respect it has it's own "distinctive" look. Well it doesn't look as glossy as the original Galaxy S. Also the carbon fiber or carbon fiber patterned battery door is kind of cool, though a flash for the camera would have been the best design add-on at this point :).
Will this phone b released in the uk? Does this have hdmi output like the galaxy s? X
rtimi, 18 Jun 20101st and foremost why do American Carriers like changing things on the phone and design. It is ... morei think they like to change the name and looks cause they always neautur the the hell out of it...at$t's new data plans are a f#$%^*% joke!!25$ for 2gb?? 15$2mb?...good luck if you like to stram music or video!!
1st and foremost why do American Carriers like changing things on the phone and design. It is sure of At&t to downgrade this phone by not adding the front camera and changing the design. I'm tired of variations of phones. I love this phone but to many variations would make it look like a feature phone and not what it's supposed to be( the best darn smartphone in the world). This is why iphone sells because everyone knows what to look for when they say iphone. Make a brand name out of your phone and stop listening to carriers.
OMG! Copy of X10. Samsung can never produce phones as beautiful as SE.
Again ruined by the lack of a camera flash - cheap and easy to include but a further Samsung total failure
@n8 i agree looks x10 on front! The only thing that i don't like samsung is the color case is black!..... like the ui,and durability the way samsung built there product !