AnonD-308243, 30 Mar 2016ok think about this, an SD820 or exynos 8890 rendering a screen that only has 1136x640 and the... moreapple didnt optimaize the chip for QHD screens. if they did that A9 would be more powerfull. cant you understad that? are you that d#mb?
For a 4 inch phone and with that price tag,phones performance is stellar lets be honest. I am an android user but i am a little disappointed about this years "flagship" phones..
Actually quite a poor score considering the awful resolution and having more headroom with none of the 3D touch resources running. Which leads me to believe that the iPhone SE is underclocked, possibly due to being sourced from less ideal yields. Which is a smart way to recycle your fab process TBH
If you've ever spent any time rendering, encoding or even enthusiast level gaming you will know resolution is a huge deal. The difference in GPU computations and bandwidth is not negligible.
QHD phones literally render more than 4 times the resolution of the iPhone SE
AnonD-1825, 30 Mar 2016This is for all android users who keep saying the same excuse over and over again why android ... moreok think about this, an SD820 or exynos 8890 rendering a screen that only has 1136x640 and then think of the power the two SoCs have and there lies ur answer. the minimum pixel dimensions on android powered phones is 1920x1080 give or take. and this Se' screen is only a small portion of the 2560x1440 pixels this above mentioned SoC have to work on all the time. not say apples A9 is not fast in anyway it is a good SoC as well i would like to see how it will handle a QHD screen though, should be intresting :)
AnonD-387177, 30 Mar 2016WHere is picture and proof that Iphone 6s plus goes up to 137k? This means before antutu 6.0 h... moreHere is the proof you are welcome, android sucks
WHere is picture and proof that Iphone 6s plus goes up to 137k? This means before antutu 6.0 his score was like....117k when Samsung S6 was on 90k?
Hopefully Apple will make a cheaper plastic looking version like the iPhone 5c, but keeping the same internals. I actually prefer the look and feel of the 5c to the 5s.
Lol, 30 Mar 2016All this for 400$, Android just got BTFO.400$? Maybe in US. Elsewhere, l don't think so. In some parts of Europe 5S is still selling at almost 700 bucks.
On side note, isn't the screen a little bit..too small for device that size? Xperia Z5C manages to get .6 more on virtually same footprint..
This is for all android users who keep saying the same excuse over and over again why android phones are slow and laggy and can't keep up with iPhone
"Because they run higher resolution". This test pretty much shows what we already knew, the resolution makes very small difference in performance.
I actually thought the SE would be a good deal faster due to the lower resolution.
soo it more faster and cheaper than 6s ??? good job apple ... good job ... s