AnonD-497032, 23 Apr 2016Dude, i believe they will be successful with this phone HTC 10.
Have a good day.Dude, hope to be so.
Have a good day.
Oleguson, 24 Apr 2016Dude, from what i read, you are far from reality. You do not know, than the amateur level, it'... moreSorry but what you're saying is subjective. What I said is an objective fact. I don't know why you're acting like you're in the know when you don't even acknowledge what I said, which is 100% true.
HTC 10 is an interesting phone. Can compete with LG G5. But il exceeds positively to wreck his Samsung S7.
AnonD-442781, 23 Apr 2016You clearly don't know anything. You'd have to zoom in 3x to even match the resolution of your... moreDude, from what i read, you are far from reality. You do not know, than the amateur level, it's better to learn from professionals. This boy, why does OMED he knows what he's talking about. talks. You beat plains. The actual tests, not the dream of you and other fans have samsung highlight these shortcomings of his S7, than other phones, such as. LG G 5 par-example.
AnonD-442781, 23 Apr 2016Sorry but you clearly know nothing of photography. hahaha. .. not only he, you're far from reality in terms of understanding how to make photos and what are the minimum requirements for cell phones.
AnonD-518129, 23 Apr 2016The quality of the components, the quality of the software-drive, image photo quality.. and. .... moreDude, i believe they will be successful with this phone HTC 10.
Have a good day.
AnonD-496804, 23 Apr 2016The HTC lost customer (on me). The only criticism that have done this phone is that they made... moreMy dear mate, please give them some time, those from HTC, and then to test, just the two of us, on the real, this camera, to which you refer. May have remade the driver software and then have the results, not like those of the S7 from Samsung. I don't know why, but i feel so, and know, as i'm not mistaken never ..:)
OMED, 23 Apr 2016Mate, confused doing great. S7 is below the level of G5 as resolution, sharpness, contrast, et... moreYou clearly don't know anything. You'd have to zoom in 3x to even match the resolution of your phone. And by then if you think it doesn't still look as sharp of does as 1x (it doesn't), then you know higher resolution doesn't matter and isn't the bottleneck.
Rafe Firmani, 23 Apr 2016Define "old' lol.
Have a nice day mateI thought you understood what i meant. But seeing it is not. Because i respect your, will respond. It's simple and trivial for any child kindergarten to mean "old."lol
HTC One M9
OS Android OS, v5.0.2 (Lollipop)
Chipset Mediatek MT6795T Helio X10
Secondary 4 MP, f/2.0, 27mm
Have a good day, dude.
AnonD-442781, 23 Apr 201612mp is fine. The bottleneck when it comes to quality photos on smartphones isn't resolution. ... moreMate, confused doing great. S7 is below the level of G5 as resolution, sharpness, contrast, etc. 12MP main camera, used on S7, has major flaws.
The upfront cost is there to scare people with bad credit rating. Usually these kind of people dont even have £1 in their bank account to do the credit check. Also scammers stay away from phones that have upfront cost.
AnonD-496804, 23 Apr 2016The HTC lost customer (on me). The only criticism that have done this phone is that they made... more12mp is fine. The bottleneck when it comes to quality photos on smartphones isn't resolution. The s7 gives clearer, sharper photos than the g5.
The destiny of this phone HTC10, it is like in a theatre play of his William Shakespeare"to be or not to be" approved of the people?
Personally have some doubts about that main camera rear. Something tells me that there are the same problems as ugly and useless S7 from Samsung.
AnonD-379427, 23 Apr 2016Oh well, what can I say, a cheap phone with a high price tag. Shame on you htc.
Do not buy htc> a cheap phone
> a high price tag
Oh well, what can I say, a cheap phone with a high price tag. Shame on you htc.
Do not buy htc
AnonD-252937, 23 Apr 2016£38/m is not just for the phone plans but it's for the phone too. Do you realize that th... moredid you even read what i wrote? i took the phone price in to consideration the sim-free cost not the subsidised network cost, and the unlimited plan and the phone should only be £43.50 a month without an upfront cost, not £58.