babdi, yes, i did see that comparison. And do u know that different FW versions can be, different bugs etc? Owning both (k750 and n90), i can say that n90 is better in listed areas. GSMarena has reviewed an old FW version of the N90. So u can check by yourself.
Nokia phones make up in fancy cosmetic appearance for what they lack in function.
Sony Corporation Trademarks:
All Avant Garde in the technology frontier. All found in Sony Ericsson phones. Need I say more!!!
I think you did not read the GSMarena review on comparison between N90 & K750
Nokia N90 with Crl Zeiss sucks. I dont say it. the photographs do..!. Check it out
Nokia fans are blind, is a disease. In all especialized web sites SE wins over the competitor in comparing. Only read the reviews about K750i, K700, W800, P990, K800, etc.
Quality in all characteristics is the feature of Sony Ericsson phones, and w810 repeat the history.
Nokia makes good phones but no more, and if they (nokia fans) say that walkman is only a logo they are mistaken, the impressive sound comparable to mp3 players, good headphones says another thing.
For sure the same will happen with K800 Cybershot
I'm not talking about these phones specifically, but I will say one thing.
I have a K700i, and it beats the pants of every Nokia in the 6xxx range when it comes to audio playback and themes capabilities. So to the person who says that Nokia's are better in the fields I've mentioned, eat your words.
Also. I've tried out a friend's N70 and it sounds terrible.
Are you people working for Nokia? The SE is so much better looking, and for anothing big point in the court for SE, it has 850!!! So that means I can acctually use this phone.
Stop fighting! Both phones are good!
Both cameras are good, se is better in macro mode, and 3250 has better colors!
Both phones sounds good too! There is no leader.
So i dont understand SE and Nokia fans screaming "SE is bad" or "nokia is bad". That means that they are just fans, not wise people, and don't understand anything. For them their beloved company is tha best no matter how its products are.
As for nokia better than sony, they are. Excluding all the bickering the facts are indisputable. When you compare the specification, the nokia wins over the SE. It does not matter which one you like best, the Nokia technolgically is better and looks better too. The SE is ugly.
Please stop thinking like this:
"Walkman!!! Can it get any better?!!!"
walkman IS JUST A LOGO, nothing more. Try the 3250, the N91, samsung i30o, ROKR E2 etc. Their sound IS BETTER than walkman phones.
Stupidity! You re saying that phone A is better than phone B because phone A painted with orange color! Do u using ur brain, or just watching an advertisement?
Same to camera quality. Have u seen 3250 photos? I have. And they were BETTER than k750 ones. Do u need a link to the comparison thread?
And why are u talking about N90? Its camera was better than k750 one: true colors, better macro mode, better night mode, better video recording, etc.
SE were always do average phones - cheap plastic, cheap boring design, poor screens.
Nokia phones, samsung phones are most innovative, nice, smart.
Guys as I said earlier you nee to make a SWOT analysis.List out all the best feature YOU like.Give a point each. Add the the score.The side that has more points is the winner. Compare everyting minutely including price, after sales service.
Nokia has become a factory churning out phones. They seem to have lost in their quality. Earlier phones were for simple communication and Nokia was the best. These days the phone is feature.! People are adding phones to Walkman & Digital Camera.
Nokia N90 with Carl Zeiss optics is no where close to much older K750i. Nokia MP3 sounds like a tincan.!
Here is where Nokia has failed. Can anyone thump the table as say with confidence that Nokia has better optics or Walkman than SonyEricsson. Nokia N
SE maybe the best,with CyberShot and Walkman behind it.But Nokia gives us the same function plus Symbian in a less price.
Anyway I like both of it.I would buy both of it.
I really dont understand why people always equates market share over quality. I think SE has smaller share, because most of its handsets are pricy. You know why its pricy, because it has the best of quality. Go SE go.
If you talk about innovation, ericsson (Sony Ericsson) is always take the advantage. The first Symbian phone was ericsson r380s (The EPOC). Remind that Symbian is a joint of Nokia, Ericsson, Panasonic, etc for a common SO for their phones. Ericsson found the SIG Group, this group make the develop of Bluetooth technologies, T68 is the first phone with colour screen, etc. Because this Sony Ericsson W810 is a winner against 3250.
Nokia always make good phones, mass phones, a lot of models per year while sony ericsson only make few models.
Nokia always make average phones, (average cameras, average mp3 players) into their phones, but only average, no more.
Sony Ericsson make few phones, but really good phones (outstanding quality in their camera, excellent sound in their mp3 player) and this is the true.
Sony Ericsson always win the technologycal battle in cell phones world over all manufacturers, because Sony and Ericsson are giants in their respectives areas. Ericsson sell technology to other manufacturers, is the 1st place in GSM networks supplier
well... im not the mobile specialist, but looking at the specifics n features guys, sony is way better
StoP FIGHT here.. :-P Sony Ericsson is da best la.. Dude. Nokia is rubish come so many model!! MAke ppl blur... Cos so many models tht's y nokia get more market share . All this is rubbish..