it looks like samsung flash player. not original
It's 699 euros in Spain :)
i think that sonyericcson w900 has better properties than nokia n91 and its price is less much than that of nokia
It's 1500 euro in Belgrde, Serbia.
It's very expensive here in Romania , I can't buy it :)
N91 not really expensive in Singapore, cost ard SGD$980. Asian package come with sennheiser headset and leather pouch. Sound quality impressive. Hdd do not generate heat. Solid build. Look is much better if you were to see the set itself and not through photos.
it cost IDR 7,650,000.00 (approx USD 850.00) in Jakarta, Indonesia
i'd rather buy a laptop. this is junk.
in serbia phone is 1500 euros he is very expencive and i think he's not worth that money i have wanted to buy him but when i saw the price i changed my mind.Phone is very good and everyone who has a chance to buy it but on a smaller price take it
AWESOME AWESOME. This handset is the best ever fokes.If your thinking about buying one,DONT think anymore just buy it........
..and then some "Ivan" told me that i know nothing and this model looks good. Guys its not just me, go do some research, N91 has been voted as the ugliest model of 2005 that nokia has ever come up with in some mobile phone site.
Quality is not just everything. If iPod looks like this,there is no question that their sale will drop. To me it will always be a heavy-urgy-costly brick.
To my surprise, in some websites even N80 cost less. What to say!
Geez, Tell me guys, who really prefers to do theie surfing on there phones? Who is really going to prefer surfing on an 2 inch screen vs a 15+ inch screen? Who really prefers to type on a phone than a keyboard.
Point is WI-fi on a phone makes no sense really. the money your gonna pay for wi-fi isn't worth it. Not to mention a wi-fi connecting isn't as readily available a a gprs connection from your phone company.
Sony makes cameras and speakers, nokia doesn't. So when you hear people say sony is the best why question it. Just look at the n90 pics vs the w800. The nokia lost big time.
SE uses memory stick duo, Nokias use M.M.C etc. If you did your research you will see that access times with MS are faster than M.M.C . Also SE has way better battery life than nokia.
With 8 gb cards coming out just now, why rant and rave about 4 gb. Not to mention its micro drive which when dropped means hmmmm you tell me.
To name
If you talk about cyber shot you remind that sony sell camera sensors and technology (HAD, superHAD) to others manufacturers of DSC, Samsung only sell this 10, 8, 6mpix models only in korea, in europe or america no need to sell this phones because marketing factor, all manufacturers have their 3mpix models because market, only LG plan to release 5mpix camera phone in europe soon.
And the megapixels number isnt the same of quality.
Screen theme, nokia only have N90 in the market now, N80 isnt released. SE have QVGA screens few models, they dont make multitude of phones like nokia or samsung, this multitude have the same characterictics, only change the appearance.
And N93 CZ, this is a name nothing more, you see this in sony CZ cameras with carl zeiss lens always loose to olympus, nikkon and leica powered cameras, the only advantage of N93 is optical zoom and photo quality is a doubt. The same is with N90 with plastic CZ lens, a bulky and expensive phone with photo quality almost the same to more cheaper and lighter K750i. Carl Zeiss lens is only brand to convince more inocents.
The 3250 have better sound than W800!!!! is incredible!!!
look this link please, focus group comparison between music handsets: http://www.mobile-review.com/review/music-phones-en.shtml (for sure is the worse music phone, only S60 is advantage)
And stilish phones, nokia with stainless steel covers are pretty, but bulky and heavier like N91 and N90. I go with samsung and motorola by this feature
Talk about tech, nokia have excellent phones but the final user wont need really all of this tech, HD in a phone is risky, HD is a weakness in a cell phone coz phone fall and die, flash memory is more recomended and faster.
P990 isnt released yet, but the release day be the best phone in the market for sure like all P series.
SE has the advantage of Sony partner, sony develop technologies in electronic areas like cameras, video recorders, etc.
Nokia try follow but havent the support, they buy tech to others manufacturers like CZ.
N91 is a great phone, but HD is a weakness. Is bulky and weight. Is a brick
damn
i have this phone and is the best phone ever Guranteed or i pay u money for it
592 in Espana is not much if it's really sim free. If That would be the price in Netherlands. Then the phone would be like 50 euro with vodafone contract
to Tarantula
>Who says that samsung camera is better than cyber shot only could be a blind
-the cybershot branding in just a logo, not more. Samsung has 10, 8, 7, 6, 3.2 MP optical zoom camera phones, nokia will present one tomorrow 3.2 CZ 3x optical zoom camera phone.
>in screens sharp is the best VGA, nokia has one superb screen 352*416 only in one model (in N90, this brick planned to have this screen supposedly), few models of nokia have QVGA and almost all smarphones have the riculous 176*208 in 2inch. Samsung, moto and SE have QVGA and 176*220 screens in their models.
-Nokia has 352x416 screen in N90, N80, E60, E70 and 320x240 in N71, N92, E61, 6270, 6280, 6233, 6131/6126, n73, n93. Se has 320x240 only in S700, w900, p990 and k800. 13 against 4.
>About tech, wifi in 8 nokia smartphones, but all are the same: S60, WiFi, etc. Only change the screen resolution and form factor... This is the nokia tech??????
- Is it bad that nokia phones have such features as Wi-Fi, 3G, DVB-H, Hdd, Symbian etc? What do u need else?
>SE have only one, but p990 have all possible tech and more friendly OS UiQ
-P990 is great device for sure. But where is it? September in a best case.
>In sound quality, who says that SE is worse? for example look to the 3250, the embodiment of mediocrity, the worst sound.
- 3250 is cheap 3xxx series device, it supposted to have worse sound than high-end phones (N91), but still it is very good and not worse than w800 has - check by yourself!
For now SE has only 1 (!!) 3G phone (w900, which is brick too), Z800 and Z1010 are outdated, 1 good screen phone (w900 again, cause S700 is not producing long ago, and k800 is not out), no wi-fi phone, no smartphone (p900/910 are not producing long ago and others are not out yet), no form-factor variety (candybars mainly, no sliders, no decent clams), no materials variety (similar-looking plastic in k750, w810, w900, no metal phones) etc etc...
Se is good, but far from the best.
about 630E in Lithiania ;-)
In spain 592€ sim free
in Romania n91 is not 1100euro it's like 2400RON clouse to n90:) so you beter look again:D
To name
Who says that samsung camera is better than cyber shot only could be a blind, in screens sharp is the best VGA, nokia has one superb screen 352*416 only in one model (in N90, this brick planned to have this screen supposedly), few models of nokia have QVGA and almost all smarphones have the riculous 176*208 in 2inch. Samsung, moto and SE have QVGA and 176*220 screens in their models.
About tech, wifi in 8 nokia smartphones, but all are the same: S60, WiFi, etc. Only change the screen resolution and form factor... This is the nokia tech?????? SE have only one, but p990 have all possible tech and more friendly OS UiQ
In sound quality, who says that SE is worse? for example look to the 3250, the embodiment of mediocrity, the worst sound. And in mobile-review says that N91 have better sound is only personal opinion, read, also says that focus group test divide their preferences equal between W950 and N91 in respect to sound quality.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up