So if it would be adjusted to "Your Liking" what could have they improved on? Let's say it would be re-released as a revamped version.
"I've got an idea... Let's look at all the phones in the market and see whats successful and what works, then we will do the exact opposite!"
I blame Windowz Crap Mobile. They shouldve put Android instead on it than that crap dying Windows Mobile OS
Chrishd32, 10 Aug 2016Doesn't surprise me. Who would want a device such as this? Its bulky, doesn't have premium spe... moreLet's just say this was a disaster from the start. I'm surpised the funding got as far as it did.
Wow, regardless of the comments claiming the obvious.... what i'm amazed the low % of the profit (less than 20% of the expected) it's just too little
Doesn't surprise me. Who would want a device such as this? Its bulky, doesn't have premium specifications and worst of all..... It is running Windows Phone software which lacks Apps. I gave it a go on Windows phone back when the Nokia 1080 was made available. Excellent device for its camera capabilities but the App ecosystem was lacking. Years later the App store is still lacking in popular apps which makes the "Smartphone" a "Dumbphone" and a complete waste of my time. I would be one to support a third popular OS and Windows does have potential but they were just to late in the game to make wave.
No wonder. Like everyone else is pointing out - tacky design, low specs and WP. Nothing to be excited about. To make it through the kickstarter you really have to stand out, this doesn't in the slightest.
The price is way too high for a niche phone like this. If they had made it $200 I am sure they would have made their goal.
two tone backcover? that's it?
Kickstarter needs to be astonishing to be able to reach the goal. No wonder this project fail.
The specs are so low though. And the two tone design is way too tacky. And the biggest flaw is that it runs on WP. Almost nobody is supporting it nowadays from the developer camp.