Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016Lol apple never had Qualcomm SoCs. iPhone 2G to 3GS were Samsung, since iPhone 4 it's appleI was talking about how A9 beats snapdragon 820. Close your mouth!
Please.. Please change.. Don't like Qualcomm.. They can't handle more apps and features on Samsung smartphone..Qualcomm can only handle basic smartphone like iphone and others..
Unknown , 10 Sep 2016Rip qualcomm I bet no one will miss Qualcomm anyway.
Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016Can you explain why they should use Nvidia over Amd?Nvidia have produced results in the mobile sphere, they even have exclusive games which may also be available on Samsung flagships depending on how negotiations turn out.
Samsung really want to make all their smartphones explode. They didn't only want the battery to explode but also the SOC and GPU.
Anonymous, 10 Sep 2016True. Qualcomm losing two of the biggest smartphone manufacturer. Next they will lose everybod... moreAll the companies can't make their own architecture and ditching qualacomm by samsung is limited to flagships only....
If the note line will still be alive by then, it's something to look forward to.
AnonD-573944, 09 Sep 2016hummn.it seems Samsung is planning for gaming smartphones and tabletsVR content i guess
Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016First Apple, now Samsung. Qualcomm is finished! True. Qualcomm losing two of the biggest smartphone manufacturer. Next they will lose everybody else because other manufacturer would think it is a 'trend' to ditch Qualcomm. No longer excited for Snapdragon chipset in the future.
Surely as AMD fan I'd support AMD. Their newest graphic card offers very good price/performance also.
hummn.it seems Samsung is planning for gaming smartphones and tablets
Simon, 09 Sep 2016Why is that? Why would you bring such bias here? Are you suggesting AMD's quality control is i... moreIntel, Amd and IBM invests in technology. Nvidia hadly ever and if they do it is for their own benefit and not for the benefit of pushing technology forward. Case in point Gameworks and Gsync. Gameworks kills performance even on Nvidia gpu and was allegedly made so people would upgrade soon and to also make AMD cards perform badly by over tessellation in games.
Gsync is good but could have been done withot the proprietary addon in the monitors. Again to lockout the competition.
In contrast AMD developed Mantle now vulkan, Co developed Adaptive sync (freesync) intel will soon use adaptive sync, gpu open, HBM and the list goes on.
Like you I will happily support AMD.