It looks amazing as far as the leaks r concerned.Waiting for the launch
I like the fact that they have more good colours to choose from. I said I am waiting anxiously for this phone.
Oh yes, Mate 9 will surely beat Samsung note seven. Indeed note seven did not live up to expectation, S7 is still better than note7. one plus 3 beat note 7 in speed hands down. Note 7 is too expensive 900 dollars on the market. Mate 9 will be the best phone in its price range, powerful but moderate price.
vark, 29 Sep 2016Sorry but my money waits for the one with 8 GB RAM.You may have to wait till 2018
jack, 01 Oct 2016 the dual sim model is only for 64 gb model ? No. The 64gb model will be the single sim version. The 128 and 256gb will be dual sim
Tero, 29 Sep 2016GPU performance is a disappointment at best.(50%~65% of samsung's offer depending on the freq.... moreBut now the Kirin 960 has a Mali-G71 octo-core GPU, you now you don't have any reason to claim. If you don't have sure about that search in the internet you will find these specs. I don't know about the finishing of the Huawei phones but i think that a phone with the specs of the Mate 9 won't have steal of low quality. It's a flagship, remember that.
i like huawei mate series but the price is not reasonble,also add font like samsung and lg.
Also lanch huawei all smart phone with out waranty and more good look and with colourful disply
If the screen resolution will be QHD, I'll buy mate 9 without hesitation by using all my saving for a phone, otherwise I will go for Note 7 despite of the battery problem.
Ritzie, 28 Sep 2016How come it's a disappointment? Didn't Huawei made it clear before that they are reluctant to... moreHuawei not reluctant to use QHD as in the Huawei Nexus 6P released over a year ago with QHD resolution. If they want a 6" flagship killer, then I see no choice but to go for QHD at least in one of the 3 versions, which will then put them in line with their own Nexus Flagship , Last 3 generations of LG's and last 2 generations of Samsung Phablets.
GPU performance is a disappointment at best.(50%~65% of samsung's offer depending on the freq.) That metal construction is simply cheap by having two plastic on the back. They can't even achieve the color uniformity! And so much for the camera, their flagship P9 only got 80 on dxomark, though dxomark is controversial but that huge margin(comparing to a dozen of 88~86 phones) is no accident. This price is far from a steal.
Not getting a new phone until this comes in. Personally I find the higher end model a little pricey, I also am keen on the Xiaomi Mi 5S Plus. I will wait until both are out in the wild before I make my decision.
I hope it's not QuadHD. It's just not the worth the sacrifice in battery life.
Good now smack an IP68 on that beast and we'll get a note 7 killer
divis200, 28 Sep 2016Another stupid statement. It depends on usage and galaxy s7 actually has a much better enduran... moreSo why don't we just look at the reviews of both devices and call it a day :?
leecher88, 28 Sep 2016my friend listen carefully when i say something now take a pen and write : my friend own both ... moreAnother stupid statement. It depends on usage and galaxy s7 actually has a much better endurance. My phone can stay a month without charging or even more if I don't use it. Both of these phones have different chipset and other things. Why do you think it's the screen that takes all of the battery? The way you compare things is stupid and biased.