It's probably 653. 625 doesn't have enough power to run Qhd. And knowing gionee it'll probably cost upwards of 700 usd
Octa core 2GHz, I hope it's Snapdragon 625, not some cheap MediaTek...
And the thickness... Couldn't they just put there a 5500mAh battery and keep it on 9mm level? It will be big, thick and heavy, when it could be an overall great device...
But that's just my opinion, keep scrolling.
This phone is definitely gonna succeed if they keep it around 400-450,I won't mind a heavy large phone if it comes with good large battery and a sturdier body and a good camera but I doubt tgey are gonna sell as their flagship and gonna go for sale much pricey
Is it possible to make the thickness within 8.5 mm and shrink the battery to 5000mah ?
Anonymous, 12 Dec 2016Let me add some more. Samsung X820 released in 2006 at 6.9mm is the thinnest phone 10 years ag... more6.9mm is awesome. My phone is 7.1mm and I thought it was already thin. thin doesn't always => the rest. Battery on this phone is huge
Listen, the only reason you'd need a battery that big is if you are a gamer. It better have a snapdragon 821 or better or a kirin 960.
i'd like to know what are they looking at, seems interesting XD
now joking aside, well the battery pack seems legit, problems is the rest doesn't add as much as it should be, although it might work as a charm (never used a gionee so no precedent on the regards) let's wait till the price is out (sadly it probably won't get to my country and bands are usually not compatible here in Peru but let's hope for the best) ^_^
Eske Rahn, 12 Dec 2016"quite thick"? How things change. Ten years ago hardly any phone was thinner than that... htt... moreLet me add some more. Samsung X820 released in 2006 at 6.9mm is the thinnest phone 10 years ago. People thought its only logic to see smartphone getting thinner but ever since U100, phone start to get thick again due to smartphone. It is strange to see that our flagship smartphone is still thicker than the thinnest device 10 years ago.
Eske Rahn, 12 Dec 2016"quite thick"? How things change. Ten years ago hardly any phone was thinner than that... htt... moreSamsung U100 at 5.9mm thick in 2007. And it is a basic phone. You were saying?
Blu replace this with a SD 820/821 and sell it in the U.S!
"quite thick"? How things change. Ten years ago hardly any phone was thinner than that...
it would be a great device if it was a flagship chipset and some company that has good software updates