AnonD-404798, 04 Jan 2017it's 2017 not 1997 , you don't determine how fast is CPU by it's GHz
Same mongoose core. So GHZ is the only way to determine the speed. It's 2017, but in exynos's case it is like 1997. No wonder they bumped the number by just 5 , even them know that cpu would be slower and only gpu would be faster.
First generation that Exynos does not get a bump in numbering, that tells you something. The migration to 10nm was disastrous, it almost cut off performance.
AnonD-404798, 04 Jan 2017it's 2017 not 1997 , you don't determine how fast is CPU by it's GHz So educate me in how you do so?
Anonymous, 04 Jan 2017Nor in CPU, if they use their same old architectureI think GMP means gross mega pixels. Total of all camara mega pixels
Anonymous, 04 Jan 2017Nor in CPU, if they use their same old architectureThe core is a built on Cortex licensed design. So it is a slightly tweaked ARM Cortex core design, not a Qualcomm custom core design like the Kryo in the SD820. Which Cortex it is based on is anyone's guess at this point, but likely either A72 or A73, which is disappointing since they're no where near the single thread performance like the Hurricanes in the A10.
We've already seen A72's performance in Kirin950 and Helio X20 and they are slower than the current Kryo and Mongoose. Since this is the first build on Cortex design, I guess we'll have to wait and see how much customizations can affect performance/power/efficiency.
Later this year when Apple put the A11 on the 10nm process, and can squeeze another core or 2 on the die... Apple will likely own both the single thread and multi-thread crown.
On a side note, disappointed that the LITTLE cores are not the ultra power efficient A35. I'd much rather have extra power savings on the background tasks cores. May be they're using A53s to bump up multi-thread benchmarks.
AnonD-491921, 04 Jan 20171;Qualcomm supports ultrasonic fingerprint reader
2;Bluetooth 4.0 is faster than bluetooth 3.... moreremember extinct species, it reminds me of what gonna happen to human kind.. you don't know that, but I do. yeah so I also know who's lieing. you can say you made a processor and I ll ask you to show it.... ever heard of AI,it's activ...in your phone in your nabour phone, everywhere. hear goes the thing about technology, nobody knows the exact true..we just know a version. I happen to be the God, I am.. you are just a man claiming to be an owner of some outdated phone... you see people are already looking for a particular gadget.yeah it's my property.
in fact it's so crucial that NSA watched me for last 5 yrs..so everyone reading this know who are.. good luck.
Herodroid, 04 Jan 2017so looks like processors will be smaller, will have better efficient, less heat and 25% better... moreDude you gotta be kidding right
The 10 bit colors rendering and Q-Sync are enough to make the upgrade,plus they will be considerably faster but expensive too.
skylark, 04 Jan 2017"Cameras of 32GB resolution" LMAO ;-)Maybe 1 photo takes up 32GB haha
Anonymous, 04 Jan 201725% better GPU performance. Like the smaller advancement in GPU performance in years, all the ... moreAnd make it smaller in the process and added a lot of other stuff so that processor dont sip power when doing everything
AnonD-552536, 04 Jan 2017No1: having "fingerprint" in specsheet is a representative of bad management in Processing Uni... more1;Qualcomm supports ultrasonic fingerprint reader
2;Bluetooth 4.0 is faster than bluetooth 3.0
3:yeah says the keyboard warrior(that is you BTW)
4:OR Release a flagship processor every year all other companies
Battery life troubles 72% of users under that research. The 42% in their material is either a massive typo, or they wanted to skew it because battery life will not be improved due to doubling the amount of cores, and 25% battery saving is per core..
DealBreaker, 04 Jan 2017lazy ≈ vicious marketing,they already have the SD850 but that is not for this year!No wondering... Probably they will release it in 2019.
Anonymous, 04 Jan 2017So.. they don't want to compete with apple in the GPU department?Nor in CPU, if they use their same old architecture
CozImBatman, 04 Jan 2017Yeah, if you would notice, its written GMP, not GB. so, obviously it was a typo. So, quit bein... moreI know that.... But now their typo is even more confusing. GMP? GigaMega Pixels? That has to be huge.
it's 2017 not 1997 , you don't determine how fast is CPU by it's GHz
As the article says, Snapdragon 835 has the same architecture as Snapdragon 820. This means the only thing that improves the performance is the move from 14nm process to 10nm. That is the only one real improvement in SD835.
AnonD-387177, 04 Jan 2017Ah guys guys. Now now, dont be a fools.
1) 2,45ghz is higher than Sn820 or Sn821
2) It wi... moreAnd that's useless. The only reason why they added 4 more cores to SD835 is multi-core benchmarks, because most people are primitive and they only look for the highest number they can find in any benchmarks: the multi-core performance. And in multi core, the Exynos 8890 with 8 cores is better than Snapdragon 820. But these people forget about the fact that single core performance is much more important. And in single core, the Snapdragon 820 is better than Exynos 8890.
So the reason why Qualcomm didn't improve anything, just added 4 more cores is to beat the competition in multi-core benchmarks.