All this spec improvement and smaller size sounds like an accident waiting to happen. I wonder if we'll get a repeat of the 810 with heat issues?
Snapdragon 650 performs very well. Snapdragon 835 is just good on paper.I dont think that there would be a huge difference between the performance of the 820 and 835 in real life
Lazy company, no say lazy companies, Qaulcomm, Mediatec, Hisilicon.. with a lazy competition, i believe that all flagships should be powered by the snapdragon 835 last year, LAZY.
Kudos Qualcomm! Still the apple's A10 is the chip to beat.
25% better GPU performance. Like the smaller advancement in GPU performance in years, all the while Apple is posting yearly 40-50% gains in GPU.
No wonder Qualcomm is eating dust at this point... Bad engineering hurt them ... alot.
Impressive stuff. Not sure if I'll see a major difference between chipsets as I consider myself a regular consumer and not tech savvy in the least. My snapdragon 801 phone runs just fine to this day as does my other phone that uses the SD 652.
No1: having "fingerprint" in specsheet is a representative of bad management in Processing Unit manufacturing.cos fingerprint is nothing but a downgraded camera module, means any more- marketing people ll call it a tango dual camera module or something.
No2: Bluetooth 3 is clearly faster than 4, forget 5...4 was designed for SMART usage say lil and tiny wareble device, ... with extremely low price in mind.
No3: FinFAT is a stupid manufacturing processes, you get to make your shit 10times bigger.it depends on the universe exploding theory.everythig is becoming bigger so you make something big then compress it, best idea for miniaturing Instigated Circuit.not good for Computing device.
No4: how many times nowadays company release a processor, could be a sign of bankrupt company.