Someone have bring up the Kodak brand from the grave and think customer will pay insane price just because of some nostalgia?
Will probably not work in the long run.
Dude, 06 Jan 2017Hahahaha this junk is not even real Kodiak, just a sh-t company who uses the brand name and pu... moreI forgot companies can do that.
First of all it's a MediaTurd X20, secondly it's $550, tertiary it only has 3000 mAh battery and 3GB of RAM. DOA much Kodum?
mel, 06 Jan 2017is that a copy of a famous samsung tmobile memoir back in 2009??? is identically same design f... moreLooks more like the LG Viewty I had back in 2008
with that kind of price I could buy a phone and a cam separately because nowadays people buy branded celfons.even the design is not catchy to the eye
Hahahaha this junk is not even real Kodiak, just a sh-t company who uses the brand name and puts in sub par specs. Avoid.
is that a copy of a famous samsung tmobile memoir back in 2009??? is identically same design from outside! lol
It really should be remembered that despite the real lens, it is just a tiny Sony IMX230 sensor, that is 1/2.4 "
Making it FAR less interesting than the Panasonic CM1 from a photo-perspective.
First reviews already report that the camera is average at best so except for the cool design i don't see anything interesting about that phone...
Definitely not worth the price. At least you tried, Kodak. Now please leave the smartphone industry.
The price could be justifiable if the camera would be fantastic. But if it isn't any better or even comparable to the top brass of 2016, then Kodak are wasting their time.
it can't do the most important job, connect to internet. that requires GSM/3G/4G
Tip us
883k
142k 87k
355k
RSS
Log in
Login with
Sign upFacebook Google