Anonymous, 30 Jan 20173500 with 10nm is better than 3600 with 16nm, and my current phone (S6 edge+) has only 3000 wi... moreDon't twist my comment I said 3600mah running 10nm is greater than the 3500mah using the same processor 10nm I want upgrade not downgrade did you get it?
JackJones999, 30 Jan 2017The display is far more infuential than the SoC and that is considerably larger. Set a high CP... moreI'll be fine, the screen size increase from the S6 edge+ will be only minor and pixel amount increase incredibly minor, and the battery increases by 500 mAh + the 10nm processor which does play a big part if you do something power intensive on the CPU. The 10nm processor power efficiency will only really show when it's under real use such as in graphics-intensive gaming, but on idle and web browsing use the screen does use the most battery, correct
I have no time to play intensive games on my phone during the day, and that's mostly why I have +50% left of a 3000mAh battery on a 16nm processor at the end of the day (while having WhatsApp and Kik open the whole day, partly Samsung battery optimization too?), and when I do play something graphics-intensive, I always have a charger on hand
Anonymous, 30 Jan 20173500 with 10nm is better than 3600 with 16nm, and my current phone (S6 edge+) has only 3000 wi... moreThe display is far more infuential than the SoC and that is considerably larger. Set a high CPU usage app. running and turn off the display with it running in the background, then just play a video. I guarantee the the video will drain the battery much faster.
Anonymous, 30 Jan 2017Very very bad analysis instead it's ahead in the competition by using 3,600mah they downgraded... more3500 with 10nm is better than 3600 with 16nm, and my current phone (S6 edge+) has only 3000 with 16nm and it gets me through the day with +50% left, not worried
Even if it doesn't happen in the s8, i hope someone would make a fingerprint scanner underneath the display like previously rumored.
Moreno786, 30 Jan 2017I don't want belive that this is galaxy s8. Anyway the front is good the back is very bad.completely agreed. hate the phones with fingerprint on the back!
Anonymous, 28 Jan 2017The non-plus version leaks really are underwhelming so far, 3000 mAh battery with 4GB of RAM i... moreVery very bad analysis instead it's ahead in the competition by using 3,600mah they downgraded to 3,500? 10nm processor in 3,600mah is greater than 10nm in 3,500mah used your common sense.
Anonymous, 30 Jan 2017SD835 cpu is not that faster from last year's Exynos, so don't expect wonders there (10% at m... moreExynos is bad proc. Many developer use SD, thats why more efficient in energy and feature. If exynos is good, why dont samsung just use that procie for their flagship. Why use only SD now.
Someone Else, 28 Jan 2017Not trying to defend the render or anything, but if I put my finger at the back of my 5.1 inch... moreYes, I believe some people also would love it just like you. but for me its a deal breaker, at least if they put it under the camera lense meaning the fingerprint scanner located in the center of the back of the phone which I think its the common location, I'll considering to buy it. Well, let see then, its just a render anyway not a final design :D
dead_shot, 30 Jan 2017samsung know what he want to do you no need to tell there stupidYou mean they knew their previous phones would explode? It was actually a feature?
TheOnlyNicknameLeft, 29 Jan 2017Stupid place for finger print scanner ..samsung know what he want to do you no need to tell there stupid
Nagin99, 30 Jan 2017Looks very real, also that's the perfect place for Finger Scanner ergonomically ...I really li... moreDo you think it is a good place for the fingerprint scanner? Will it be easier to touch the camera lens accidentally?
Looks very real, also that's the perfect place for Finger Scanner ergonomically ...I really like this design
Julliard, 30 Jan 2017Its like saying S8 is irrelevant. So, Samsung should had release flagship every 5 years to mak... moreIndeed, at this point every-year release is a moneygrab. As far as internal hardware goes there is not enough difference happening year over year.
Even more so if you use Qualcomm's SoCs
Actually given current leaks S8 would probably be worse in certain key aspects as compared to S7 (a bit of how S6 was worse than S5 in several key aspects as well; i.e. no waterproofing, no removable storage/battery, worse battery; with Samsung those things happen)
Anonymous, 30 Jan 2017SD835 cpu is not that faster from last year's Exynos, so don't expect wonders there (10% at m... moreIts like saying S8 is irrelevant. So, Samsung should had release flagship every 5 years to make it relevantly different from previous flagship isnt it? Your logic is very good.
Sciucafez, 30 Jan 2017Different proc sd835 and also gpu. Iris scan. EtcSD835 cpu is not that faster from last year's Exynos, so don't expect wonders there (10% at most). GPU would be better indeed, but no game can max GPUs from 2 years ago even , so gpu is irrelevant.
I don't want belive that this is galaxy s8. Anyway the front is good the back is very bad.
The front design is great, the screen is very eye catching. But fingerprint placed next to camera module is bad news for user. I believe the performance of SD835 will have significant improvement than SD821, but not so sure for less battery consume that SD821. But for sure the fast charge will get better. 4 gig or 6 gig RAM? Does it matter! Samsung shoud make 2 variants or probably 3 variants for hard fan of spec-holic with 8 gig RAM.