Indian, 31 Jan 2017No Snapdragon ( For Good Performance)
No Fast Charging (Let's See How Much It Time For Chargi... moreThe review is already on the site and they said it's pretty bad.
And abt GPU, adreno is a Qualcomm thing u can't expect it in other socs plus Mali by itself is quite good but it depends on how much cores u use. Mediatek only use 2 to 4 and hence the bad performance. Look at S7 with 12 cores it's pretty much a match for adrenochrome 530
Look Like Copy Of Moto E3 Power Same Only Little Bit Improvement With Huge Battery....... Price Will Play Important Role :)
No Snapdragon ( For Good Performance)
No Fast Charging (Let's See How Much It Time For Charging)
Mali??? ( Y No Adreno?)
175 Gram???? ( I Think Because Of Huge Battery)
Let's Wait For Review or Blindly Buy Redmi Note 4...... Front Camera 8mp Good For Selfie Lovers ... Let's Wait Wait & Wait For Expert Reviews ( I Don't Think It's Better Than Redmi Note 4 ) :)
Asus could have used a crappy Snapdragon SoC and it would have still beaten the most powerful Mediatek joke.
The phone isn't even made official and GSMArena already has a review! Nice job, keep up the good work.
Oh but please, put the battery life test results in there as soon as possible, it's not complete without those, especially for a phone that has a large battery as its main selling point.
Knowing Asus they will overprice this phone even if it has Mediatek sh*t