Anonymous, 02 Feb 2017She gets $ 750 for a phone which was worth maybe $ 350 today? This is very generous from AppleShe bought it two years and a half ago at the full launch price. You call that generous? I would sue Apple if they give only $350 according to current price.
Very interesting... One day after the Q4 2016 results are out and Apple is ahead of Samsung this article comes up. I assume there is something more to this which is not told. :)
Anonymous, 02 Feb 2017Because the science behind batteries are invalid when you take into account that logo. That's ... moreYeah, because this is 1 igniting and 1 swelling in some months. With Note7, it was over 30 explosions in one week. And also, Samsung batteries always swell up, I even know somebody whose S3 Mini battery swell up and he had to use a fat ugly battery case
[deleted post]Every phone with lithium ion battery has a small chance to ignite. This could happen to an iPhone as well as to a Samsung, HTC, Huawei, Xiaomi, OnePlus... because they aren't 100% safe. The Note7 was a different story, almost every day one Note7 blew up and Samsung even said it was their fault because they designed the batteries wrong
Anonymous, 02 Feb 2017People shouldn't use their phones while charging. It dramatically reduces the battery capacity... moreEr... not really. If your phone heats up while doing this, your phone has a problem
She gets $ 750 for a phone which was worth maybe $ 350 today? This is very generous from Apple
....that's a Samsung patent... Apple will be sued for copycatting that burning/explosion feature from sammy. loool
both iphone and samsung are crap, not safe, and dangerous to own.
apple and samsung may be the top dogs. but when it comes to bulletproof, shockproof and other proof, Nokia is the top dog...
That's dumb. Why Samsung could not refund to people which phones caught on fire like apple does? Because Samsung at least takes some care on customers.
hahaha...its happens with iphone almost every year but no one takes notice of that...because its apple..