Romie Lee, 23 Mar 2017it should be better with just a simple galaxy image on it instead of actual branding logo or w... moreThey do have a tri-star logo back then since the 30's but they ditch that in the 90's. Now, its text-only logo. Looks more modern and simple. No need to copy Apple.
xocomaox, 23 Mar 2017Such a strange decision to not have the product name on the device. Makes it look like a cheap copy.Totally agree with you because I would said the same!
samsungsonyapple, 23 Mar 2017Sony xperia xz premium looks stunning Xperia XZ looks good only from back. In front, it looks outdated with those huge bezels
Verizon and AT&T will put their logo on the back. T-Mobile and Sprint do not. Verizon is the worst at it although surprisingly the Google Pixel I got from them doesn't show any Verizon logo, boot up animation, or bloat. Verizon didn't molest the Google phone similar to iPhones.
If Verizon wasn't so expensive with a $20 monthly access fee and didn't brand or cripple the Android snartphones so much, I would stick with them. Happy with my T-Mobile One plan now. I would get the S8 ONLY if there is a trade-in promo involving the S7 edge, battery life is much improved, and Samsung got rid of the lag that plagued the S7e.
Thinking of selling my SD820 S7 edge. I searched for an address last night using GMaps and the animation would stutter when it zoomed on the map. I do it for my G5 and Pixel and animation was smooth as butter. Their touch response is also quicker. SD820 S7e is clearly inferior at smooth, fluid software experience to the other two including LG which was known for a heavy, laggy, ugly skin prior.
My LG is on Android 6, btw. My S7e is on Nougat. So there is a chance getting an S8 if a great trade-in promo comes up involving its predecessor which I find overrated. Just keep searching on Slick Deals for one. I only keep the S7 edge for water-resistance and the occasional novelty for VR. And yet,VR is very pixelated and grainy when streaming it on my network.
T-Mobile = no carrier logo branding! And faster network than Sprint.
it should be better with just a simple galaxy image on it instead of actual branding logo or written logos
I don't understand you st**id samsung haters and lg sony and apple. This phone is ugly? Seriously? Which phone on the market is beautiful than this phone( exept s6 edge or s7 edge). So stop hating and go to lg or sony etcc pages. This is ugly but we will see again soon. Best android seller as usually.
Ugh... I really enjoy OP3 only having the 1+ logo on the back and no text anywhere. The less branding the better.
xocomaox, 23 Mar 2017Such a strange decision to not have the product name on the device. Makes it look like a cheap copy.It is actually a selling strategy for most brands. If I had a choice, I would prefer to have the one without huge branding details on the front. The back is enough just like the iPhone and OnePlus.
Joselius, 23 Mar 2017Meanwhile, in Japan they dont even have 'Samsung' written on it at the front or back. They onl... moreSuch a strange decision to not have the product name on the device. Makes it look like a cheap copy.
Meanwhile, in Japan they dont even have 'Samsung' written on it at the front or back. They only write 'Galaxy' on the back of Japan version.