Womwww, 01 May 2017Better than Sammy, oversharpening and also fake colours,does not match real life colours,over ... moreActually Samsung is better. One of the pic is like something green splattered over it, now i know why everyone i know that uses Sony's phone before decided enough was enough. They seem to have good camera but their phone...
Anonymous, 01 May 2017Sony's photos are so inconsistent, dark areas are totally dark and some colours are completel... moreBetter than Sammy, oversharpening and also fake colours,does not match real life colours,over saturated
Sony's photos are so inconsistent, dark areas are totally dark and some colours are completely weird wtf. I thought their cameras are better now. After seeing this i'm skipping their phone now.
AnonD-542706, 01 May 2017Xz premiun destroy iPhone 7 in dxomark ok?Old z5 scores higher the iphone
AnonymouseX, 01 May 2017Sony Xperia XZ Premium looked so disappointing at image processing
... morePixel size is according to resolution and sensor size.. You dont just choose it..
1/2" is almost 50% bigger than the current one.
OIS is not fast enough to work with PREDECTIVE HYBRID AUTOFOCUS that is an evolution of OBJECT TRACKING.
The default of auto mode is 12mp. Much better than 8mp of Z phones..
But it can goes up 17 and 19 mp.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium looked so disappointing at image processing
Indoor shots looked mushed detail - I THOUGHT THEY ALREADY HAVE FIXED THAT?!
As a Sony fan, camera hardware must change
20.7mp 1/2" sensor w/ DRAM, f1.0, 1.5um pixel, OIS+EIS, and get Google/Samsung's Image Processing algorithm - that's it, is it really hard?
If I were them, I'd rather make a great successor to the Nokia 808 PureView and Lumia 1020, but seemed to be impossible to cram everything
May someone from Sony engineers understand this and enlighten them that this is not something from a flagship worth $700?
Obi Wan Kenobi, 01 May 2017This new GSMA viewer feels like a downgrade. Even if you have a big wonderful high-resolution ... moreI wonder what would happen to gsma if everyone stopped using it. And I wonder even more when they make changes nobody likes, and ignores its readers by keeping the fugly look.
Zenodroid, 01 May 2017Since pixel xl has the best camera, it should be compared to that instead of iPhone. Even s7 w... moreSee the video:
LG g6 vs Google pixel camera showdown
You will find out who is the new winner.
This new GSMA viewer feels like a downgrade. Even if you have a big wonderful high-resolution screen, the new viewer occupies only a fraction of the available space. It's such a turnoff....
Someone Else, 01 May 2017"Guess its only your personal preference about ip7 camera being better here, isnt it? ..."
... moreMe a biatch only when others are biatch.
For example, if I state these XZ Prem shots are superb indeed, and someone calls me a fnboy for it.
Acon, 01 May 2017Even huawei P10I love my p10 plus, but I sure need to play a lot more with the camera. Just damn hard to see correctly with great sun and shades on.
Tann Hauser, 01 May 2017Guess its only your personal preference about ip7 camera being better here, isnt it? ...
... more"Guess its only your personal preference about ip7 camera being better here, isnt it? ..."
Yes it is. Do you have a problem with that? Like I said, the best smartphone flagship's camera just comes down to people's personal preferences (for most users). Some people like blueish colours, some people like warmer colours. Some people like saturated colours, some people like natural colours. So, there's no need to be a b tch and to defend your favourite smartphone just because someone else have a different opinion than yours.
But still waiting for the official one
XZ Premium must have better camera than the XZs
X Performance got the same camera as the X, and somehow produces even better results
Same must go here
But I'm not holding on here
-Waiting for the "true" flagship Sony of IFA 2017
To be honest I could see any difference between the cameras? when you start getting to that point I would suggest you buy a decent DSLR camera anyways.
Overall, as a consumer I like iPhone a tiny bit more. Consumer = I want nice point and shot photos on auto.
Sony wins in the situation when there is good light and no big contrasts and then produces more "punchy" colours. I know that iPhone ones are probably more true to life, but I want "nice" photos from vacation.
Sony loses when there is high contrast between different parts of the scene are present like in building photos (13) or beach with stones(25). Then the dark part is too dark to me. Also, what is with the left bottom corner in the beach photo(23)?