AnonD-3583, 14 May 2017This is not fair, the phones are to big, the best screen size is 4.7 - max 5 inch.I'm sure you was in 4 inch only phones 2 years ago
Anonymous, 14 May 2017That would be the equivalent of a near-side bezelless X Compact.Yesss!! A fine successor to my Z1 Compact that I will keep using until there's a modern equivalent. :)
This is a pretty lame poll.. Starting with 5.2 inch screen? Seriously? Acting like big screen is the way to go... Can't wait for people to start carrying their tvs for calling and checking twitter...
Less than 5.2". Or if the screen is 5+ then it has to have the footprint of a phone as small as 4.7" or less.
The phone using experience is worse and worse nowadays. You need to charge your phone 2 or 3 times a day, you cannot use your phone with one hand, and you have no headphone jack. I don't enjoy using the modern smartphones at all. The smaller sized phones all have crappy specs. I don't understand what is wrong with the phone makers.
This is not fair, the phones are to big, the best screen size is 4.7 - max 5 inch.
Anonymous, 14 May 2017Google Pixel has 5.0", Galaxy S7 has 5.1" (still less than 5.2"), iphone SE has 4.0" and Xperi... moreAnd the iphone 7 with 4.7" display likely sells better than any Android smartphone
I chose 5.2" because that was the smallest size in this poll, otherwise i would have chosen 5" but that option was not included
Anonymous, 14 May 2017I believe if there was still a market for sub 5", then manufacturers would still be making them Google Pixel has 5.0", Galaxy S7 has 5.1" (still less than 5.2"), iphone SE has 4.0" and Xperia Compact has a 4.6" display.
I can't vote because the ideal size is 5.0" or even smaller. I have a Nexus 5x with 5,2" display and the display is too large.
This poll is not fair. Why you have > 6" option but no < 5.2" option?
Please do a poll with aspect ratio (16:10, 16:9, 2:1). I do not like this trend of elongated phones. I wonder is it really what people want.
Well I think going over 6" isn't problem even up to 7.8" (based on calculation with current 6.5" 16:9 ones as a base) but with 21:9 aspect ratio (at least it is a standard & not something funny like those from Samsung and HTC). & I do think we will need some bazel's on upper and lower sides at least till we use fingers. I would stay 7.33 with almost none side bazel's for peple with larger hands so that they have operational one hand grip & 6.84" (based on 5.7" 16:9) for those with normal size hands those who more prefer more compact ones would stay on up to 6.24" (based on the 5.2" 16:9)...
Smartphones need to progress upto 6.5 inchers. And making the aspect ratio wider is clearly a stupid thing to do as Samsung has done. Both the length and the width of a screen matter for a good experience. Infact the aspect ratio should be 16:10, a much better option than the old 16:9. For example if a person wants to type in landscape mode clearly 16:10 will be better. Also an increase in length will ensure a wider view in portrait mode.
AnonD-523334, 14 May 2017Where is 5.0"? U may say it is obsolete and mostly smaller versions are 5.2". But 5.2 isn't c... moreI believe if there was still a market for sub 5", then manufacturers would still be making them
viveksubhash, 14 May 2017essentially the taller screens like s8 have a 5.2 inch like width right?? i like bingewatching... moreI tbought because the s8 & G6 had these tall screens, watching a movie in landscape would give large black bars on either side due to the incorrect ratio. I believe the only advantage of the tall screens is when viewing web pages or navigating the OS