to be realistic, me myself do not need such 5mp camera resolution, wifi super-g, Hsdpa, and many more. basically the enthusiast mostly buys what N-series offer, but for more realistic persons like me, buying phone with such features you don't need just ruin your pocket. it's not the matter of having enormous features that makes a good mobile phone company. it's the matter of how the company can deal with the customers giving them such good quality, handy and functional and have a very good price-feature ratio. those features that spreads out of the mobile-tech doesn't really impress me. i am just behind the power of the platform to handle those powerful features and to be frank i hate what samsung,SE and Nokia does. samsung always lacks what basic features should be in a phone. they do not also focus on the quality of the features they produce. issues like messaging function poorness, very expensive pricetag that is somehow do not decrease for the last 10 months and their very fragile slim designs (though they say it's durable but to be true,lower ends tend to be more durable than those higher ones... is that quality?). i am no fan of slim mobiles motorola,samsung produces. neither nokia and SE's slim lines of N/6xxx and walkman/cybershot series. Nokia always tremendously makes featurepacked phones but the worse is that the feature sometimes lags, hangs, and restarts and the worst is the poor battery backup. i think they must first focus on the quality and the power consumption before adding different features into their units. the name also do not imply quality as of now, it is popular but do not promise users a value to their money IMO. price is tad too high for a mobile(maybe that's the reason they call it media computers)=) and most users arrive at their customer service centers for repairing and repairing. the motorola's concentration to razrs is their way to prevent looses of profit imo. their razrs is somewhat arrives with a very high price that you may first think of buying other model of that price. and they are somewhat blind that features also matters for a phone. and still they have poor quality with their batteries and UI but because slim phones are in on this generation. but the good thing is that they lead the low-ends bringing features that can be seen from higher-end models. SE has very stable market sales as of now unlike their parent sony. SE has still on their way of developing new technologies at a attractive price ranges. and they are the best if price-to-feature ratio is mentioned. but they started as a company producing high ends with such features unseen on other phones of other brands(this is where nokia realizes importance of having many features).now they can hardly produce P-series phones just because they still have limited budgets for having some experiments. so feature enthusiasts just condemn them for the lack of features they wanted on that brand name. i also am disappointed to that. but i am impressed that the quality of their phones is uncomparable as a user of so many phones eapecially the rich back-up navigations if some hardware navigators like joystick malfunctions. but some may disagree for sure=D. but i think they should also make their feature-hungry fans happy aside from the so many mid-rangers and low-enders. and i think the series K,W,Z and J should be in mid-ranges because the only series destined for the high-end bracket is the P-series one. i can't think of SE being wierd that K800,W900,W850 is ranged with P990 as high-ends... why?
but anyway it's just an opinion in my part. and i love those companies.
Products copy each other for better. Yes, creation from scratch is ideal, but look around, what would be the product did not borrow any element or function from others? Siemens? where are they? Why can't they better?
Wow!! I can't wait to lay my hands on this beast! I had been waiting for this for a long time. Any idea when it will be available?
new communicator.. !! WOW..
this is wat i was waiting for.. as am a 9500 user
and dont wana loose d power of using a communicator but at the same time wanted some change with ma present communicator...
so now i hope.. my dreams wil be fullfilled soon.. njoy.. !
Can I say something about Nokia, Samsung , LG and SE.
They can make good phones but they all are copying Siemens.
For example Siemens Slidephone, now they all are making slidephones, Samsung most of it. Phone with the first MP3 player was also Siemens now others have it too.
A lot of thing they are copying and I hate that. They all think that they are the best, but didnt invent it. So bad Siemens dosn't make mobilephones anymore, if they did they can make better Phones than Nokia, Lg, samsung and Se together.
They had software bugs and didnt solve the problem right away, took al long time and people didnt buy Siemens phones as they used to. I will only the best......
Nokia latest phones still resamble dinosaurs in size and form. They should take some design classes from Sony Ericsson and Samsung.
This phone will bring a revolution in communication........
Hats off to Nokia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOW! its realy great one .. All awaited phone! I wish Nokia 9300i should come up with a cam to fullfil my dream ...but this was realy a shock to know that in E90 they cme up with 3.2 MP camera and Radio ... its simply superb n worth paying ..
This bit of news from Nokia is expected - flood the market with all sorts of phones. We should expect that from the market leader. As to which one is the best phone, that is another matter. It ultimately depends on the need of the user. Nokia and SE have distinct approaches to the consumer, with Nokia apparently learning from SE and other competitors about bundling practically all features in one phone with the recent spate of product launches. And that is good news. My personal preference is for SE, as I have had very good experience with the convergence of technology and my needs as a phone and PDA user. Some may disagree with me but that is okay. I have also used a lot of Nokia phones (9000, 9210i, 9500, N70, N73 and N91) but the quality and feature richness of SE will make me choose an SE anytime. However, the E90 looks interesting. But then again I will have to range that versus my P990i which I'm satisfied with.
I have been expecting a phone like this for quite some time and I admit the specs. are impressive. But the price is exagerated. I whould probably buy something in the 300 - 450 euros. I have a pda and all the software I need works fine in Windows Mobile. The only thing it lacks it's the ability to connect to the internet by itself. A new PDA/phone will resolve that at ~300 euros. Bottom line is, the price is to high (great product).
And something else, I do have Nokia and the reason is that Nokia 9210i or the 9500 that I have now has functions that no other mobile phone has but that doesn't makes Nokia the best company..
I want also quality and Nokia doesn't have a good one for 785 euro that 9500 costs in the market.
Hey body who ever you are, you can not call someone stupid because he said his opinion about something that you are big fun of..
And for your information I know what I'm saying, the last 10 years I'm running 2 stores with mobile phones and I have seen a lot and I know a lot about mobile phones..
condor is right, Nokia makes lemons. On my N80 I have to put toilet paper under the battery cover to stop moving, the slider is also loose from day one. Weak battery and crap camera are just the "cherry on the cake".
well, the nokia phones have the better display but for all SE fans wait for the I-Mobile 902 to be branded a SE in early 2008 - 5MP, 640 X 480 video and H A N D Y !!
Condor... are you a bit stupid? Honestly if you think that Nokia has no quality, why have you bought most expensive phone from Nokia for 10 years? I think you are just another liar, who hasn't ever owned Nokia's phone. I think you are just trying to make a _small_ difference for Nokia's sell by posting B*llS*it.
For those of you who have not lost hope in SE, this the review of a phone which incorporates much of the SE technology we'll see in the SE phones this year.
Stop slagging Nokia if they wouldn"t have joined the mobile market the handsets would not have been any better,they make the easiest mobiles to use thats why people buy there mmobiles,o.k some might have been big when they started but there getting smaller an lighter an cameras getting better an one other thing who made the others panic by putting radios on there mobiles NOKIA so just ask anyone which mobile they would like to buy an alot would say nokia because of the ease of use ,the N95 will shut the others up
"ha which handphone is better then nokia then?
using a 2nd camera with 2megapixel? video call will be more laggy. think man"
LOL. Read some more mate, it is not a 3G phone it is a 3.5G phone, therefore no lag ....
People here talk without knowing many things....
Ok.. Everything you people say it's cool and Nokia makes the best mobiles but the quality is very bud and don't think that I'm a se fun.. The last 10 years I had only Nokia.. The 9000 first and then the 9110, 9210i and now I have the 9500..
I'm telling you no quality at all....