The S8 twins deserve to be within the range of 2013 flagships.
2017 flagship hardware with UI lags?
It looks 2100's, but it performs 1900's.
Pia, 01 Jul 2017OnePlus believe this so much that they cheated they way to the top of the listLOL
karrouma, 01 Jul 2017Haha. My xz premium got 186452haha my iPhone 7 got 188732
The iPhone 7 Plus is no longer apple's best performing iOS device, it's now the iPad Pro 2017
First of all, an absolute well done and definitely keep it up to HTC, for this first place of the U11, and so beating even the S8 duo, iPhones and so on. Additionally, regarding the (& sorry for maybe anticipating, haha), quote: "some may ask: Do they need to be this fast and powerful?" 100% definitely it's not for me, I mean I absolutely will never ever ask that question. For me that I have a passion for technology, passion & study history, evolution, etc. That question just doesn't even exist in my mind. Basically, if it was so? Now we would not be in this so called "modern life/era" but we will still be in the caves, etc. And so it is absolutely clear that it is essential that we continue on this/that same path, and evolving/improving tech is one important segment of those building blocks. So the answer is 100% YES!
Who cares about the performance and difference in ms when opening apps?
What you should care is how long your phone can survive while performing day-to-day tasks easily (battery life), and the difference may as great as hours.
Think again, peoples.
According to that diagram I feel sorry for the galaxy s8 it's very embarrassing and shame
Fanboys think their phone is the best because of this LOL Good laugh
Bebe Rexha, 01 Jul 2017Simply say, I don't care about benchmarks. It's the same story to GeekBench. Xperia XZ Pre... moreIf they want to be accurate, they should kill all apps first. Then, they put the phones for 30mins in the same place. After that, they test, thats how I do benchmarks. The only reason it is scoring that low is because they did some intensive apps. If they place it for 30mins, my XPERIA XZ scoring 150097 wouldn't be a problem in AnTuTu the same reason for their review for XPERIA XZ PREMIUM
Herodroid, 01 Jul 2017They cheated just because to show that this phone is a beast jn performance. It wins against i... moreThat awkward moment when people think that a speedtest is the gold standard of smartphone performance...pffffffff
numero13, 01 Jul 2017O dont know how GSMARENA only score 140k. I tested today and i scored 175k, and off course the... moreEither GSMArena reviewers used up the phone too much that it throttled down a bit to avoid heating, or they did a little bit of tweaking like turning Stamina Mode on, or it could be just AnTuTu not showing the XZ Premium's full potential, which is a huge shame 'cause it even beats the Galaxy S8 twins in graphics performance without even throttling.
Bebe Rexha, 01 Jul 2017Simply say, I don't care about benchmarks. It's the same story to GeekBench. Xperia XZ Pre... moreO dont know how GSMARENA only score 140k. I tested today and i scored 175k, and off course there are no tricks, its the normal score for SD 835 and ufs 2.1 ROM
xXENDER FREAKXx, 01 Jul 2017What is weird about AnTuTu is that the phones are not up to date some are from 2015. If u type... moreSimply say, I don't care about benchmarks.
It's the same story to GeekBench.
Xperia XZ Premium on GSMArena scored 144K only, like wth?
heck stop being so bitter people. HTC u11 is the best.Just Accept it
Bebe Rexha, 01 Jul 20171 - Who the heck cares about benchmark scores? Xperia XZ Premium beats all these phones in a s... moreWhat is weird about AnTuTu is that the phones are not up to date some are from 2015. If u type a particular brand in the search section u can only find the latest like LG G5 if u search LG. Sony for XPERIA Z5 PREMIUM. And other phones much older. Plus their apk version is 6.3.3 which is the latest but it is updated a few months ago. They should have monthly updates to add in newer phones man